Greg
animals food and drink
gardening general
history multimedia
opinion photography
politics Stones Road house
technology
Greg's diary
November 2017
Translate this page
Select day in November 2017:
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Select month:
2017 May Jun Jul Aug
2017 Sep Oct Nov Dec
2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr
Today's diary entry
Diary index
About this diary
Previous month
Next month
Greg's home page
Greg's photos
Network link stats
Greg's other links
Copyright information
    
Groogle

Wednesday, 1 November 2017 Dereel Images for 1 November 2017
Top of page
next day
last day

Still no Police contact
Topic: general, technology Link here

It's now been 6 days since I received notice to contact the NSW Police. And despite all attempts, I failed.

OK, email to to customerassistance@police.nsw.gov.au, explaining the situation and asking for help. And how about that, I got a call back from Senior Constable Adam Ginnane within an hour, saying that he couldn't get in contact with DSC Todd, who was apparently out of the office on another matter, but that he had spoken with a colleague, and I would get a call back later in the day. He also gave me details of how to contact him if needed. It seems that Joan's comments yesterday were wrong: customerassistance@police.nsw.gov.au is in the same building as the help line I have called so many times, and they could have put me through.

Shortly later I got email with a reference number for the incident:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:53:37 +1100
From: noreply-customerassistance@police.nsw.gov.au
To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <groggyhimself@lemis.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to contact NSW police [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Reply-To: customerassistance@police.nsw.gov.au

I particularly like the two email addresses in those headers.

Finally I got an email from Todd!

The email you received is a generic email that is automatically generated from our computer system when we create a report. This email does not have my current contact details of which I have no control over.

In relation to your matter, a police report has been created (Report Number- ....) and preliminary enquiries have identified the suspect account holder as being located in the area of Burwood NSW. As a result, your report has been transferred Burwood police station for further investigation. Contrary to the information supplied in the email you received, I am not the officer in charge of the matter as ACORN is an assessment centre and does not investigate.

OK, finally. But why this completely wrong information? And the most worrying thing about the matter is that nobody seemed to think that there was a problem.


More bank scams?
Topic: technology, general, opinion Link here

Another mail message today, ostensibly from ANZ, my bank, and also potentially related to the fraud case:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:10:42 +0000
From: ANZ Customer Enquiries <CustomerEnquiries@anz.com>
To: "groggyhimself@lemis.com" <groggyhimself@lemis.com>
Subject: Your Pay Anyone Disputes - Do Not Reply To This Email
Message-ID: <5E045F2C4F1AEA4A9AA3177E0CAA1CC424CCFDF8@EXUAU020HWT151.oceania.corp.anz.com>
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.161])
        by www.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFE31B72806
        for <groggyhimself@lemis.com>; Wed,  1 Nov 2017 06:11:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [85.158.137.35] by server-1.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A0/46-27020-89569F95; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:11:36+0000
X-Env-Sender: CustomerEnquiries@anz.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-134.messagelabs.com!1509516664!23298582!18
X-Originating-IP: [203.110.235.80]
Received: from unknown (HELO EXIAU002MELP003.ecorp.anz.com) (203.110.235.80)
        by server-8.tower-134.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 1 Nov 2017 06:11:32-0000
Received-SPF: PermError (EXIAU002MELP003.ecorp.anz.com: domain of
        CustomerEnquiries@anz.com used an invalid SPF mechanism)
Received-SPF: PermError (EXIAU002MELA002.ecorp.anz.com: domain of
        CustomerEnquiries@anz.com used an invalid SPF mechanism)

Dear Gregory

Please find attached our response to your recent enquiry.

*Please do not respond to this email as responses to this email are not monitored or accepted.

Should you have difficulties in opening this attachment please contact us on 13 13 14 (if calling
from overseas +61 3 9683 9999) or at an ANZ Branch.

Now doesn't that look suspicious? As if that wasn't enough, the “response” was a zip attachment:

-- Mutt: Attachments
  I     1 <no description>                                                                 [multipa/related, 7bit, 10K]
  I     2 +-><no description>                                                          [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 7.2K]
  I     3 | +-><no description>                                                    [text/plain, quoted, us-ascii, 1.3K]
  I     4 | +-><no description>                                                     [text/html, quoted, us-ascii, 5.6K]
  I     5 +->image001.jpg                                                                    [image/jpeg, base64, 2.2K]
  A     6 14033095.zip                                                                [applica/x-zip-comp, base64, 60K]

OK, let's take a look at it. First save it, then:

=== grog@eureka (/dev/pts/27) ~ 201 -> unzip -l /var/tmp/14033095.zip
Archive:  /var/tmp/14033095.zip
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
    49548  11-01-2017 14:10   14033095.pdf
---------                     -------
    49548                     1 file
=== grog@eureka (/dev/pts/27) ~ 202 -> unzip /var/tmp/14033095.zip
Archive:  /var/tmp/14033095.zip
[/var/tmp/14033095.zip] 14033095.pdf password: Enter
   skipping: 14033095.pdf            incorrect password

The only things that suggest that it's not a scam is that malicious email would probably not require a password, and that it contains a DKIM signature:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anz.com;
        s=June2017; t=1509516653; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version
        :Content-Type; bh=ALDE6+K67TuaRaCybge2r09ohaeHGbu7aF3nn3dZBTg=; b=YwqJF6d
        U1zIuZcam8tcq01OnOPNDsyjphA69PHJ4JR/P2PPGY77YF7yMvlzvmkvt6VzV1JdxAtOurGq0
        53PVmmJY0xVorHc5pl9hjM9WRIuULqaMXY/M92W2F5LEei9/1bF7lqaM38uPVR1n8CnrZECe6
        gbkMzVNvNrGGftv0d6m5yrrJvCB82/wNPCV/HfLK1X6RcFQWaJMRCfoU8oGaZ8l5DpO2sm42M
        fLGLjJ5XNO57M9NqqdtKpQaHlLAOB7kOW7FWlUlWWU8Y1tUj5nwOZmnx21FpOIzZkWzGodpKi
        MCnoKrc8kvYIdaM3r2fwiaWo4FRcMHn3KlMkFMEgV2w==;

But is that signature valid? I probably understand email better than most, but it makes no blind bit of sense to me. In addition, there's no guarantee that the signature applies to the attachments as well. Effectively it's useless. By contrast, the SPF failures appear to be incorrect configuration.

And yes, I almost think that the email really is valid. Only people as stupid as ANZ could think up something that so closely resembles malware, but fails because of details.

People, the Internet has been with us for over 20 years. When will Big Companies grow up?


Reinventing the button
Topic: technology Link here

Chris Bahlo has an ancient Apple MacBook which, she says, has a defective video display. The display is on the motherboard, and when she took it to the Apple people in Ballarat, they told her that it was nearly 5 years old, far too old for them to have spare parts.

I don't use the display on computers that don't run X, so that was of no problem to me, so I asked her to give it to me. She did, but there's a problem: I can't find anything wrong with the hardware. Still, time to play around with it.

But how do I communicate with it? Yes, it has a keyboard and a trackpad, but no buttons for the trackpad! I confirmed that I can plug in an (old, mouldy) mouse into it and that it recognizes both buttons, but how do I operate them on the laptop? Went looking for instructions on http://www.apple.com/, but things like Get to know your new Mac seem to assume that you know the answers. After much searching, I found a reference to a Force Touch trackpad, not a friendly name. Do I have one? How do I know? After a bit of experimentation, I found that I probably do.

Recognition 1: to left click, press the trackpad forcibly just about anywhere.

And the right button? It has functionality, as my old mouse showed. But how do I activate it? Press anywhere on the pad and you get a left click.

So I asked on IRC. We have at least three Appleheads, and they all contributed bits of information. Edwin Groothuis told me that Ctrl-click simulates a right click, and also that two fingers on the trackpad simulate a scroll wheel. Jamie Fraser said:

apparently my laptops touchpad has a right click built in (that's not pushing down in the bottom right corner of the pad). double-tap and hold with two fingers
learn something new every day

It's not clear that he was talking about Apples, however.

Daniel O'Connor added:

tap with 2 fingers or hold control and tap with one depends on how it's configured ctrl-tap should work by default

This one was interesting because Edwin hadn't heard of it.

In summary, then: it seems that, for religious reasons, Apple has done away with buttons, just to spread confusion instead. Even experienced users don't know the details.

Apple Mac: the machine that you can learn (to click on) in a single day.


Thursday, 2 November 2017 Dereel Images for 2 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Information rot
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

I've been keeping this diary for over 17 years, and I link to a number of other places in the web. I'm amazed how many of them rot. Somehow xkcd summarizes it:

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/digital_resource_lifespan_2x.png

I've taken to keeping copies of all the images I link to.


Worse than a concentration camp
Topic: politics, opinion Link here

The Government of Australia has earnt Australia a bad reputation for human rights by capturing refugees and interning them in concentration camps on Pacific islands. Fortunately there are courts, and the Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea—but not the Australian High Court—declared the camp on Manus Island to be in breach of the PNG constitution, and that it must be closed.

That was on 26 April 2016, over 18 months ago. Finally, on 31 October 2017, the camp was closed. They had only just started building alternative accommodation, which was free but unprotected.

Where were the inmates to go? The honourable thing would have been to grant them asylum in Australia. But no, they were turfed out onto a building site without protection from the weather or hostile natives. The UNHCR has called on Australia to fix things. But no, they have closed down the facility, leaving hundreds of people in fear of their lives, staying in the remains of the camp despite lack of water or food.

Is this the Australia we want? I've seldom been so disgusted.


More focus stacking experiments
Topic: photography, technology, gardening, opinion Link here

Despite everything I've been doing, my curry tree still has mites. Time for a few photos. They weren't good. The first, using in-camera focus stacking, was pretty fuzzy:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/big/Mites-test-2.jpeg
Image title: Mites test 2          Dimensions:          5184 x 3888, 2564 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Make this image small again Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 2 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 2 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 2 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

These images are at approximately 1:1 magnification (in other words, the width is about 17 mm). And yes, the mites (about 0.5 mm across) are recognizable, but none of them at all are really sharp. What about the postprocessing alternatives? Putting the same images through FOCUS projects 3 professional and Helicon Focus (which, I discover from the tutorial videos, is pronounced “Hīlicon”) gave me:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Projects.jpeg
Image title: Projects
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 122 kB
Dimensions of original: 3840 x 2879, 4194 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Helicon.jpeg
Image title: Helicon
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1286 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Once again a completely garbled output from Hīlicon. Why? The tutorials show to do exactly what I was doing, but that this strange garbled view is an intermediate stage. Could it be that the merging failed, but that it was too polite to tell me? In any case, that demotes Hīlicon as long as I can find something else, especially as it wants a subscription model. It isn't FOCUS: that still doesn't manage to merge the images in full resolution, which basically makes it useless. Despite the good advertising, all this PROJECTS software seems to have been a waste of money. There's also Zerene (I hate to think how they pronounce it), which promises better, but I haven't had time to try it.

Still, I tried Hīlicon again with another stack, this time taken at f/5.6, and using the raw images. And how about that, it produced a real image, and one that was (marginally) better:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Helicon-2.jpeg
Image title: Helicon 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 44 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1349 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So what have I learnt?

  1. Getting the initial focus is still very difficult.

  2. I can forget both FOCUS Projects and Hīlicon.

  3. By contrast, the in-camera processing puts up a pretty good show.

  4. f/16 is probably too small, creating diffraction artefacts.

  5. I seem to have a number of different bugs on my curry tree. None of them are obviously alive, but what are these?

     

    https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Helicon-2-detail-2.jpeg
    Image title: Helicon 2 detail 2
    Complete exposure details
    Dimensions: 439 x 615, 39 kB
    Dimensions of original: 269 x 377, 30 kB
    Display this image:
    thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
    Display all images on this page as:
    thumbnails    this size
    Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
    thumbnails    small images    diary entry
     
    https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Helicon-2-detail-3.jpeg
    Image title: Helicon 2 detail 3
    Complete exposure details
    Dimensions: 449 x 601, 40 kB
    Dimensions of original: 453 x 606, 41 kB
    Display this image:
    thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
    Display all images on this page as:
    thumbnails    this size
    Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
    thumbnails    small images    diary entry
     
    https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171102/small/Helicon-2-detail-1.jpeg
    Image title: Helicon 2 detail 1
    Complete exposure details
    Dimensions: 612 x 441, 49 kB
    Dimensions of original: 954 x 687, 78 kB
    Display this image:
    thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
    Display all images on this page as:
    thumbnails    this size
    Show for Thursday, 2 November 2017:
    thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Friday, 3 November 2017 Dereel
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Debugging DxO PhotoLab
Topic: photography, technology Link here

After playing around with DxO PhotoLab on euroa, it reliably hung in about three different ways. I couldn't get it to work. Deinstalling, both with Microsoft's standard tools and with a hastily downloaded Ashampoo Uninstaller 6, followed by subsequent reinstallation, didn't help.

OK, time for a problem report. How do I describe it? A video clip sounds like a good idea. OK, let's try:

What a catastrophe! It reminds me of what I tried to do with my camera 50 years ago, before good photocopiers were available to Mere Mortals. Nowadays we'd take a screen shot, of course.

OK, how about a video screen shot? That must be possible. Yes, indeed. A quick Google Search found “Debut”, which is even free.

OK, try it out, and how about that, it Just Works:

There's little comparison in the quality of the two logs. In the first case, I had forgotten to refocus after positioning the camera, but it wasn't clear until I saw the results how bad the framing was. And the file was enormous, 25 times the size of the (longer) “Debut” log:

=== grog@eureka (/dev/pts/27) ~ 224 -> l Photos/20171103/orig/
-rw-rw-r--  1 grog  lemis  715,734,344  3 Nov 20:22 1B038437.MOV
-rwxr--r--  1 grog  lemis   31,991,586  3 Nov 12:50 euroa-log.avi

About the only issue is that the cursor movements aren't recorded, and that possibly some popups don't display. But this one is definitely a “keeper”.

OK, time to submit the bug report? First remove the package again and see what's left. Just about everything! Somehow Uninstaller 6, didn't help. Something, maybe the symlinks, or maybe just the presence of non-installed files, caused both deinstallers to fail. And Ashampoo was also not able to remove the information, stored somewhere deep in the bowels of “Windows”, that I have another 27 days of free trial.

What a mess this Microsoft is! I'll have to make more investigation. A good thing that I have other machines to run the software on.


Minimal gardening work
Topic: gardening Link here

Finally it has stopped raining for a while, time to mow the lawn. Got that done with relatively little effort, but it occurred to me how little work I've done in the garden lately. And somehow, despite Mike coming all the time, the weeds are winning. Time to get somebody in and put in some real garden beds, rather than trying to reclaim lawn.


Saturday, 4 November 2017 Dereel → Ballarat → Buninyong → Dereel Images for 4 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

“Asian” food at Woolworths
Topic: food and drink Link here

Off to Woolworths in Eastwood Street to look for breakfast foods like Laksa. Found a couple, including one that I haven't seen before, and also tried some Pad Thai mix.

It's not an easy business. There's so much dubious stuff, like this “Chicken Tonight”, which is available in at least three varieties: “Classic” (not shown), “Asian” and “Indian”:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Asian-food.jpeg
Image title: Asian food
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 179 kB
Dimensions of original: 3264 x 2448, 1488 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Asian-food-detail-1.jpeg
Image title: Asian food detail 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 622 x 434, 119 kB
Dimensions of original: 486 x 339, 95 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Asian-food-detail-2.jpeg
Image title: Asian food detail 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 433 x 623, 104 kB
Dimensions of original: 205 x 295, 72 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The contents themselves didn't seem interesting enough to warrant a second look, but I wonder what the people were doing in geography class at school.


More plants
Topic: gardening Link here

The main reason I went into town was to buy some plants for the garden. First to Formosa gardens in Leith Street, where we bought a couple of far-too-expensive clematis:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Clematis-1.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 237 kB
Dimensions of original: 3889 x 5184, 5417 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Clematis-2.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 132 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3153 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/Clematis-3.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 171 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 3908 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We have space for one, and the other will need to wait until we dig up the garden again.

After that, off to Bella Gardens in Buninyong, really the private house of Amber, a Facebook friend of Yvonne (as she found out on arrival). Petra Gietz had told us about the place, and she was there helping out when we arrived. Picked up a number of various things, including unspecified orchid bulbs, Aquilegia, Valerian, thyme, sage, a ground cover that they call “Baby's Tears” (interspersed with what we think is forget-me-not), and what we think is a Kniphofia:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171104/small/New-plants-1.jpeg
Image title: New plants 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 220 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 7807 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 4 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Together it cost us as much as each of the clematis.


Dinner
Topic: food and drink Link here

No photo again for Saturday dinner. We had Königsberger Klopse.


Sunday, 5 November 2017 Dereel Images for 5 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Tiny flowers: almost!
Topic: photography, gardening Link here

It's been three years since I first tried to take good photos of some really tiny orchid-like flowers, about 1 cm across. They're flowering again, and now I have a camera with built-in focus stacking. Time for some more attempts.

First with in-camera stacking, which is what Olympus mean by the term. A maximum of 8 shots, so my focus was limited. Here's the best of the three, taken at f/11, but still not covering the entire flower:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171105/small/Mystery-flower-3.jpeg
Image title: Mystery flower 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 64 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 715 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 5 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

OK, take a stack for external processing, which Olympus call “focus bracketing”. I had planned to take 40 shots at f/5.6, but once again had finger trouble, and ended up with only 20. Here's the result:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171105/small/Mystery-flower-4-detail.jpeg
Image title: Mystery flower 4 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 579 x 467, 57 kB
Dimensions of original: 3530 x 2846, 1514 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 5 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's almost as good as I would want it to be. I could have used some more shots—the tepal at top left is becoming unsharp—but I have almost all of it in focus. And this time it's not cropped, like the in-camera photos are. The biggest issue is the angle of view: the anther (if that's what it is) in front is only visible from the outside. Next time I'll need to position the camera more carefully.

One thing of interest is the depth of field. The flower itself is sharp, but the sharpness ends abruptly down the stem. That's to be expected due to the technique, but it creates an effect that you can't really get any other way.


Analyzing focus stacking Exif data
Topic: technology Link here

How does the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II focus stacking work? It provides you with two basic settings: “step distance”, a number between 1 and 9, and step count. This photo gives some details:

http://www.lemis.com/grog/Day/20171105/Focus-stacking.jpg

Richard Turton has done some investigation of the meaning of “focus step”, and come up with a relationship to the aperture for one lens, not completely coincidentally the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60 mm f/2.8 Macro with which I took today's photos: it's the obvious choice for this kind of work. But in the process he introduced another parameter, “focus count”. What's that? It's reported by the camera in the Exif data in Makernotes tag 0x301, and he quotes:

https://1.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~forums/58266769/5e8f30526d3a4f2085b366230db2c6a7

OK, what did I get today? For the first (closest) of the 20 images I got:

0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 18714
0x0303 Focus Step Infinity             : 5392
0x0304 Focus Step Near                 : 18597
0x0305 Focus Distance                  : 0.185 m
...

I had thought that “Focus Distance” is a value calculated by exiftool, and I've already noted my irritation that it is only accurate to 5 mm. But it seems that it's a real tag, which doesn't help. “Focus Step Infinity” and “Focus Step Near” don't change in the sequence, but the count does:

0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 18666
0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 18618
0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 18570
0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 18522
...
0x0301 Focus Step Count                : 17802
0x0305 Focus Distance                  : 0.195 m

The “Focus Distance” is really useless. In my 20 shot sequence I only have three values, repeated many times. But comparing the focus steps with Richard Turton's graph is interesting. His values are much lower than mine. “Focus Step Infinity” must be round 1,600, while for me it's nearly 5,400. Is this a function of the lens, or of the camera? All of the photos I took today with the 60 mm have the same value, although I powered the camera down between shots. Looking further shows that that's a coincidence. The photos I took with this lens on 15 August 2017 show a value of 1223. Is that because they were taken with the E-M1 (Mark I)?

No: this photo, taken over a year ago, also shows the value 5,392:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20160908/small/Mushroom-2.jpeg
Image title: Mushroom 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 77 kB
Dimensions of original: 4609 x 3456, 1569 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 8 September 2016:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It was also taken with the E-M1. It's surprising that the value was exactly the same as today.

So, a hypothesis: there are a well-defined number of focus steps between “infinity” and near, and the real distance is dependent on focus_step_count - focus_step_infinity. That would imply that focus_step_near - focus_step_infinity is a constant. I had thought that the choice of focus_step_infinity was random, but it seems that it might not be that random after all. I suppose I should go looking at more photos.

The other thing that is apparent from Turton's graphs is that his lens appears to report a smaller value for focus_step_near - focus_step_infinity, round 10,000. My measurements show a step count of 13,205, both for today and last September.

What about in August? Damn! There I have:

Focus Step Count                : 2535
Focus Step Infinity             : 1348
Focus Step Near                 : 18597

So “Focus Step Near” is the same in all cases, but here I have a total step count of 17,249. Hypothesis busted. Is “Focus Step Infinity” maybe unimportant? That still doesn't explain why Turton's “Focus Step Near” seems to be round the 11,500 mark.

That still doesn't give a transfer function for focus step to distance. If Richard Turton is right, it could really be (intended to be) steps of equal unsharpness. I need to re-read his article and think about it. I should also analyse the relationship between “Focus_Step_Count” and “Focus Distance”.


Monday, 6 November 2017 Dereel Images for 6 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Shiny macros
Topic: photography Link here

Yvonne has a tiny opal, about 1.5 cm long, which she got from Essey Deayton, who apparently found the raw stone personally. Yvonne wanted a photo. How hard can it be?

I failed. All the standard tricks didn't work, probably because the surface of the gem was polished and curved. After giving up, I went looking, and found suggestions like using a light tent. But I had already done that:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171107/small/Opal-photos-2.jpeg
Image title: Opal photos 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 616 x 438, 155 kB
Dimensions of original: 4215 x 2995, 2080 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 7 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171107/small/Opal-photos-3.jpeg
Image title: Opal photos 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 108 kB
Dimensions of original: 3457 x 4608, 2404 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 7 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The best thing about it was that I had an opportunity to try focus stacking. But that's another story.


More focus stacking
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

Taking the opal photos was only the first part. Now I also had a good subject for focus stacking. In this case, of course, in-camera stacking works well enough, as long as you don't forget the crop, which is significant:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-2-OOC.jpeg
Image title: Opal 2 OOC
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 74 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1226 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I didn't even bother to try with FOCUS projects 3 professional, but I downloaded a trial version of Zerene and compared it with Helicon Focus. The results were interesting. Helicon is much faster, round 5 times the speed, it feels. But the results aren't quite up to scratch. Here Helicon on the left, Zerene on the right:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-3-Helicon.jpeg
Image title: Opal 3 Helicon
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3523 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-3-Zerene.jpeg
Image title: Opal 3 Zerene
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 86 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2707 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That background pattern is a figment of Helicon's imagination. They're not all as bad as that, but I consistently come across problems with Helicon's rendition, while I have had none with Zerene. Here's another attempt, again Helicon left, and with the out-of-camera version on the right:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-4-Helicon.jpeg
Image title: Opal 4 Helicon
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 86 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3984 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-4-Zerene.jpeg
Image title: Opal 4 Zerene
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 87 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2542 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Opal-4-OOC.jpeg
Image title: Opal 4 OOC
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 81 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1449 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

There are minor differences between the first two (run the cursor over an image to compare it with its neighbour), but they're very small. On the whole I think I prefer the Zerene rendition, but it's not clear that this would be the case for another image.

Other things I have noticed:

So which do I take? It's looking very much like Zerene, since there are too many bugs in Helicon. But is there maybe a third useful package lurking out there?


Unhappy Paulownia
Topic: gardening Link here

Our Paulownia kawakamii did not take the winter well. The main stem died, but we have new shoots from the sides. Two weeks ago it looked like this:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171016/small/Paulownia-kawakamii-detail.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia kawakamii detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 498 x 543, 196 kB
Dimensions of original: 1984 x 2164, 1224 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 16 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Since then, I removed the protective mesh. And today we found:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Paulownia-1.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 238 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 3990 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Paulownia-3.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 171 kB
Dimensions of original: 4610 x 3456, 2787 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What happened there? My best guess is frost: a couple of days ago we had a frost, rather unusual for November, and it looks as if the leaves weren't prepared for it. Hopefully it will recover.


Police: we don't care about fraud
Topic: general, opinion Link here

Mail from the police about my fraud case today:

I am a police officer at Burwood Police Station in New South Wales. I have reviewed your ACORN report in relation to the issues you have had with a seller on eBAY. Unfortunately our current operating procedures are that due to not using PayPal, the recommended eBay payment option, no investigation will take place. Furthermore, the loss of $104.99 is not a sufficient loss to warrant a police investigation. The alleged offender has also reimbursed you some of the funds, which also suggests that this could be a civil matter and not suitable for the criminal court.

Just what Craig Weber said! Clearly he knows the ropes. It's sad, though, that the police are not interested. So now I need to find how to proceed with a civil claim.


Apple touchpads: the expert speaks
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Mail from Malcolm Caldwell today about my touchpad article a few days ago:

Recent trackpads on macs allow various options for right button (or as they call it "secondary click").  I use "two finger" clicks for right mouse button.  It has become so natural for me, so much a part of muscle memory, that I could not remember that without sitting at my mac and seeing what I do to activate right click.

This is actually well "documented", but in a completely non-obvious place: its under settings->touchpad.  There you can set how you want to activate clicks, secondary clicks etc.  It even has videos to show you how to each operation (the documentation).

As you note, the scroll wheel is also replaced by scrolling with two fingers.  And it works both vertically as well as horizontally, which is good when zoomed into photos etc.

You say that you suspect the touch pad had force touch touchpad.  Force touch was only added in 2015, so if the mac was 5 years old it is unlikely that it is that old.  The absence of buttons does not mean that the touch pad is force touch.  One nice part about the force touch pads is there is no moving parts. (There is a mechanism that simulates a click feel - haptic feedback)

On a touch pad, not having to find the buttons, but just click anywhere is actually very efficient, both in usability and in space on the laptop.

That's good to know, but it shows how difficult it is to find this information without the help of an expert.


Tuesday, 7 November 2017 Dereel Images for 7 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

More orchids
Topic: gardening Link here

Walking the dogs today, found this flower in the Bliss Road wilderness:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171107/small/Diuris-sulphurea.jpeg
Image title: Diuris sulphurea
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 69 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 1512 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 7 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's a Diuris sulphurea, and not the first I've seen in Dereel. I thought that it was the first I've seen round Stones Road—the others were south of Kleins Road. But checking back, no, I've seen them round here in large numbers two years ago and even on our own property last year.


World's most widespread Unix
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

What is Unix? That depends on whom you ask. The lawyers have always had a different viewpoint from the techies. And while it's reasonable to say that Linux is Unix-like, can you say that about Android? Yes, it has a Linux kernel, but the whole interface is foreign. In my book, not Unix. Similar considerations apply to Mac OSmacOS (barely fits my definition of “Unix”) and iOS (doesn't).

Given my definitions, it's clear that macOS is the most widespread version of Unix. Or so I thought. Then I read this article: Every Single Processor that Intel has made in the last 8 or 9 years contains a hidden processor running MINIX. The mind boggles. The article is mainly concerned about security, but I'm more interested in the architecture, which it doesn't describe in any detail.


Wednesday, 8 November 2017 Dereel Images for 8 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

eBay manipulation?
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

I'm still annoyed about the way I've been treated regarding the matter with Craig Weber (eBay seller klearview_au). When I get over my anger I'll follow up. But today I was curious as to whether he was still registered with eBay. Yes. Not only that, since then he has become a top-rated seller!

And that with the feedback I left him! Went checking what feedback he had received since then—and mine was gone! So was another one of similar character.

Working my way through the little twisty passages of eBay links brought me to https://feedback.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedbackLeft, where I could enter the item number (352142223044), which the page obligingly removed, and then displayed:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171108/small/klearview-feedback-2.png
Image title: klearview feedback 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 763 x 353, 141 kB
Dimensions of original: 980 x 454, 70 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 8 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171108/small/klearview-feedback-2-detail.png
Image title: klearview feedback 2 detail          Dimensions:          1860 x 145, 74 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Wednesday, 8 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Wednesday, 8 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Wednesday, 8 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

Mutually withdrawn? I wasn't even informed! And I most certainly would not withdraw it. Tried once again to contact eBay, and this time they have yet another way: call a number (1800-322-928) and enter an 8 digit password. Did so and was ultimately connected to Steph, who told me that she could still see the feedback. I made it clear that I expected the feedback to be reinstated, and that I expected an explanation from the people who do these things. She promised to follow up, and that I could expect a call back within a week at the latest. I made it clear that if she did not, I would follow up with the Australian authorities.

Somehow eBay seems completely chaotic. I'm left with the feeling that Craig knows how to manipulate the system, either by an undocumented bug, personal contact or just plain breaking and entering. High time Amazon expands into Australia. There's no reason to believe that they'll be better, but at least I'll have a choice.

As if to confirm my opinion, while we were talking, I received email from eBay:

Dear Greg Lehey,

Thanks for calling us. Because we weren't able to authenticate you during the call, we thought the information below might help you make sure your account information is up to date.

How to check or update your postal code, address, or phone number
1. Go to My eBay.
2. Place your pointer over the 'Account' tab, and then click 'Addresses'.
3. Under 'Registration Address', click the 'Change' link to the right of the information. You will need to enter your password again to change the information.
4. Make the changes needed and confirm by clicking the 'change registration information' button.

How to check or update your credit card information
1. Go to My eBay.
2. Place your pointer over the 'Account' tab, and then click 'Personal Information.'
3. Under 'Financial Information', click 'automatic payment method'.
4. Select 'Credit Card' and then click 'Set up Automatic Payments'. You may need to click 'Continue' if you're changing your information.
5. Enter your credit card information, and then click 'Continue'. If you're adding a new credit card, you'll be asked to authorise it.

To learn more about changing account information, please visit: http://pages.ebay.com.au/help/account/change-account.html

What the hell is that about? I had no difficulties with authentication. The time matches the beginning of my call with Steph. Did she have finger trouble?


Normalizing image stack sizes
Topic: technology, photography Link here

DxO PhotoLab creates output images that can vary in size by up to about 6 pixels on a side. That's not a big deal, much less than 1%, but it breaks various software that processes multiple images and expects them to be exactly the same size. What I need is a program that can take a stack and crop the larger images to the size of the smallest.

Where can I find that? I looked, but couldn't find anything. Maybe I didn't have the right search terms. In any case, searching became more difficult than doing it myself, so I wrote a script myself. It definitely needs improvement—currently it crops all images, even if not necessary—but it has enabled me to do some more work on focus stacking.


Zerene on FreeBSD
Topic: technology, photography Link here

Another potential advantage of Zerene is that there's a Linux version. Will it run on FreeBSD? Spent some time checking, and came to the answer “Yes”. The main issue proved to be, once again, that eureka is so down-rev that I can't run modern Linux binaries on it. But it worked almost out of the box across the LAN on lagoon. Yet another reason to upgrade eureka.


Guns and murders
Topic: politics, opinion Link here

The USA has had another mass shooting. I'm surprised that they bother to report them any more. But there's soul-searching and finger-pointing every time it happens. A couple of graphic representations seem to help understand the issues. First this image from the New York Times:

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/11/08/briefing/08asiabriefinss-slide-0ORU/08asiabriefinss-slide-0ORU-articleLarge.png

This article, also from the New York times, represents it like this:

http://www.lemis.com/grog/Day/20171109/Gun-homicides-World-Bank.png

And Mikel Jollett tweets this image:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DN-K7d3UEAUSIgG.jpg

So: stop gun sales? Reinterpret the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution to restrict use to the kind of arms usual at the time it was written, and in militia-related contexts? Powerful lobby groups are going to prevent that, at least in the short to mid term. And I don't think that it would solve the problem, though it could possibly reduce the effects. Imagine somebody storming into a church with a couple of flint-lock muskets. But the real issue is the gun mentality that pervades US society.


Building dispute progress
Topic: Stones Road house Link here

Call from Maggie Keenan of Domestic Buildings Dispute Resolution Victoria today. JG King have indeed had staff turnover, and the new manager is called Ashley Barker, who is still trying to get his head around the issues. Good luck to him. It might be easier for them just to give in.


eBay pain, yet again!
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

Mail from eBay today, coinciding with a routine access to “my eBay”:

Unauthorized use of your account -- action required

We have reason to believe that your eBay account has been used fraudulently without your permission. We’ve reset your eBay password. If you had your PayPal account linked to your eBay account, we've disabled your PayPal link to protect your funds. Any unauthorised activity, such as buying or selling, has been cancelled and any associated fees have been credited to your account. Any listings that we removed are included toward the end of this email. We assure you that your financial information is securely stored on a server and cannot be seen by anyone.

Dammit, when will they finally stop? If they have reasons, they should say so. But this happened in April, May and September this year alone, and possibly on other occasions that I didn't bother to mention. What is wrong with these people? My passwords are getting more and more insulting.


Thursday, 9 November 2017 Dereel → Ballarat → Dereel Images for 9 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

A trellis
Topic: gardening Link here

Into Ballarat today to buy stuff for the planned trellis in the garden. First to Bunnings, where Yvonne had identified some trellis-like dividers yesterday. But there was nothing there that I found even remotely usable. They're really not trellises at all, more dividers for privacy, and unsuited for climbing plants. We saw a couple that could barely have done the job, at prices that were out of proportion to the function.

Finally we found a latticework trellis in a completely different place, after first having to ask for prices of other equally unsuited arches. And we were ready to pay. But of the four people at the exit, only one was manning a cash register, although there was one on the other side:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171109/small/Bunnings-checkeout-2.jpeg
Image title: Bunnings checkeout 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 131 kB
Dimensions of original: 3264 x 2448, 2432 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 9 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171109/small/Bunnings-checkeout-3.jpeg
Image title: Bunnings checkeout 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 136 kB
Dimensions of original: 3264 x 2448, 2570 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 9 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Finally we were away. How I hate Bunnings! And how I hate shopping! People who enjoy shopping clearly have no imagination, and are easily pleased.

On for some timber at Whiteheads, to DELA to order some soil and gravel, then home. Two and a half hours for almost nothing.

CJ Ellis along later on to sink the mounting posts:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171109/small/Postholes-2.jpeg
Image title: Postholes 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 612 x 441, 153 kB
Dimensions of original: 4792 x 3456, 6607 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 9 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171109/small/Postholes-7.jpeg
Image title: Postholes 7
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 180 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 6365 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 9 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It looks as if I am going to have to mount the trellises myself. I hope I have the screws and things.


More focus stacking comparisons
Topic: technology, photography, opinion Link here

Two weeks ago I took some focus-stacked photos that were less than optimal. The results with the out-of-camera stacking were surprisingly good, but limited in focus depth (only 8 component images). I took another series of 84 images of a Burchardia umbellata, of which FOCUS Projects Professional made results that I wouldn't want to use:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-umbellata-2-FOCUS-projects.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia umbellata 2 FOCUS projects
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 603 x 447, 183 kB
Dimensions of original: 2144 x 1591, 1767 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Due to the stack size issues, I haven't been able to get Zerene or Helicon Focus to produce any results. But now I can normalize the sizes. What do I get? I still need to RTFM for both products, but Zerene has two different ways of merging the stacks (PMax and DMap), and Helicon has three (A: weighted average, B: depth map and C: pyramid). Here are the results of each. First Zerene PMax and DMap:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Zerene-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Zerene PMax
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 107 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 2782 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Zerene-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Zerene DMap
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 110 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 2647 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Getting results from Helicon was more difficult. Apart from the difficulty of selecting the input images, it crashed very frequently, more than I'm prepared to accept. I must have had 20 crashes so far. And here are the results from Helicon A (weighted average), B (depth map) and C (pyramid):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-A.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon A
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 95 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 2460 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-B.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon B
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 100 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3009 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-C.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon C
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 100 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3777 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Which are better? It's difficult to be sure. Helicon results have more contrast, but that's easily fixed. All images have a sharp background (the Drosera). The real issues seem to be sharpness and delineation behind the flowers, which have moved from one image to the next. Probably in this case the best results are from Helicon's C (pyramid) processing (run the cursor over an image to compare it with the next). There are things that I don't (yet) understand about the process, and it's possible that once I do, I might be able to get better results.

The sharpest image of the flowers themselves seems to be one of these two, Helicon C (pyramid) or Zerene PMax:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-C-detail.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon C detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 530 x 509, 77 kB
Dimensions of original: 1369 x 1316, 289 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Zerene-PMax-detail-1.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Zerene PMax detail 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 542 x 499, 73 kB
Dimensions of original: 1221 x 1124, 178 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

At first it seems to be the first (Helicon C (pyramid)). But that's partially due to the higher contrast, and it suffers from noticeable ghosting, while the other (Zerene PMax) doesn't. This is also the one that kills FOCUS Projects Professional (third image):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-C-detail-2.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon C detail 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 427 x 634, 62 kB
Dimensions of original: 279 x 414, 53 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Zerene-PMax-detail-3.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Zerene PMax detail 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 456 x 592, 56 kB
Dimensions of original: 342 x 444, 51 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-umbellata-2-FOCUS-projects-detail.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia umbellata 2 FOCUS projects detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 550 x 492, 76 kB
Dimensions of original: 594 x 531, 82 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But then there's the issue of ghosting in that area, which is particularly obvious in Helicon A (weighted average) and Zerene PMax:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Helicon-A-detail.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Helicon A detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 555 x 487, 67 kB
Dimensions of original: 884 x 776, 101 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Burchardia-2-Zerene-PMax-detail-2.jpeg
Image title: Burchardia 2 Zerene PMax detail 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 581 x 465, 77 kB
Dimensions of original: 909 x 728, 126 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I think that ultimately the Helicon C comes out best here. In some ways it's a pity, because I find it a pain in other matters. Time to RTFM.


Microsoft memory use
Topic: technology, photography Link here

dischord.lemis.com, my Microsoft photo box, has 16 GB of memory, still a comparatively large amount. But after my photo experiments today, the task manager showed it using about 15 GB physical memory. After stopping the photo software, it dropped to 2.23 GB:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171109/small/Microsoft-memory-use-detail.png
Image title: Microsoft memory use detail          Dimensions:          828 x 326, 77 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 9 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 9 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 9 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

This is “Windows” 7, though I'm not too sure it would be very different in older or newer releases. But why do programs that aren't currently in use use so much physical memory? Is their Virtual Memory model really that bad? Or is this “soft” memory usage, where pages are in memory but are backed up on disk, and can be discarded without problems?

Jamie Fraser tells me that “Windows” 10 gives more details, and yes, much of this memory is available immediately when needed. It doesn't explain why the performance drops off so badly when memory is so “full”, though.

Friday, 10 November 2017 Dereel Images for 10 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Gravel and soil delivery
Topic: gardening Link here

Ted from DELA along today with the 4 m³ of gravel that we ordered yesterday. He deposited it near the gate.

Half an hour or so later Jamie arrived with the 5 m³ of soil and tried to deposit it nearby. It didn't quite work:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-1.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 610 x 443, 166 kB
Dimensions of original: 4763 x 3456, 4714 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-2.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 186 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 5845 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-3.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 203 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 6385 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

How did that happen? To get to where he needed to go, he had to go over the drain area. But unlike Ted, he stopped in the middle, with his drive wheels in the soft part of the drain. So he tried to drive off forward again, digging his way into the ground in the process.

He called back to base, and in another 40 minutes Adrian arrived with a truck and pulled him out:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-8.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 8
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 612 x 441, 146 kB
Dimensions of original: 4792 x 3456, 4189 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-10.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 10
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 441 x 611, 214 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4792, 7834 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Bogged-truck-9.jpeg
Image title: Bogged truck 9
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 612 x 441, 214 kB
Dimensions of original: 4792 x 3456, 8004 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Not much hope for putting the soil where we had wanted it, so we put it in the drain area. Hopefully Warrick will get here before it rains.

So how did it happen? Adrian tells me that it's a pretty frequent occurrence—with that specific truck, about once a day in the winter.


Getting photos off Android
Topic: technology, photography, opinion Link here

Yesterday I took a couple of photos with my mobile phone: I hadn't expected to need to do so, and I had left my camera in the car. But how do I get them off the phone? I've grumbled about the opacity of the Android user interface in the past, but I've always managed to get them off there with a little bit of searching. But not today. WiFi File Transfer, a program that fills in for missing basic Android functionality, offered to find “My Photos”, “My Pictures” (what's the difference?) and other Mys, but it couldn't find them.

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/wifi-file-transfer.png
Image title: wifi file transfer
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 700 x 385, 122 kB
Dimensions of original: 932 x 513, 75 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Neither could I. One of the problem is that this toy has no standard tools. Where's find(1) when you need it? wifi file transfer does quite a good job of tree-climbing, but that quickly gets boring.

So I decided to download the entire memory of the device so that I could process it on eureka. That will be useful as a reference in future. While doing that, however, I checked some of the other tabs. “Media gallery” found it. The photos were on the external SD card, about the only thing that gets stored there, in the relatively logical directory http://talipon.lemis.com:1234/storage/extSdCard/DCIM/Camera/, but for some reason wifi file transfer didn't look there. Now that I know, I can save the URL in a web page.

And that's one of the big issues with Android: each app does its own thing, and there's no way for another app to know what it is (though in this particular case it looks more like lack of trying on the part of wifi file transfer). But every time I use Android, I find something new to hate.


Olympus goggles
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

Olympus has announced a new product, the EyeTrek Insight EI-10L

https://4.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/4937991335/eyetrek

That report, from Digital Photography Review, is the most informative. Their own page is much less so, but shows some truly horrendous prices: the unit itself costs $1,500. Even the battery charger costs $249, more than I paid for Yvonne's E-PM2 with lens. It's billed as “developer's edition”, which I translate as “solution looking for a problem”. I have a suitable problem: I need a remote viewfinder for my camera for use out in the open. With suitable imagination, this device could be adapted. That would require something more flexible than OI.Share, of course.


More wildflowers
Topic: gardening Link here

Off down Misery Creek Road again this afternoon to look for wildflowers. The season gradually seems to be over. The only orchid I found was Diuris sulphurea, in large quantities:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Diuris-sulphurea-1-detail.jpeg
Image title: Diuris sulphurea 1 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 500 x 541, 61 kB
Dimensions of original: 2600 x 2811, 733 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Took a number of focus stacked images, but didn't get round to processing them.

Off also to Swansons Road, where I had found so many flowers this time last year. This time I found almost nothing. Yes, the usual stuff, but in particular no sun orchids and no Caleana major (duck orchids). Found one flower that I hadn't seen before, clearly not an orchid, but the photo will have to wait.

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Wildflower-10.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 10
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 245 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4237 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Radiation Tower progress
Topic: general, technology Link here

The new Telstra radiation tower has now been erected, but they're still working on it:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Radiation-towers-1.jpeg
Image title: Radiation towers 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 158 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 3665 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Radiation-towers-3.jpeg
Image title: Radiation towers 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 158 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4044 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Still, it can't be long now before we finally get coverage.


Saturday, 11 November 2017 Dereel Images for 11 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Focus stacking wildflowers
Topic: photography, technology, gardening Link here

Spent some time today processing yesterday's focus stacks of the wildflowers. There were slim pickings: in most cases I had managed to miscalculate the beginning or end focus point, and I ended up with results that were just plain out of focus. I really need a better viewfinder. One possibility would be a small normal monitor connected to the HDMI output.

There were only two photos worth looking at. Here's a Diuris sulphurea rendered by Zerene (first two images) and Helicon Focus variants A (weighted average) and C (pyramid). Run the cursor over an image to compare it with the other of the pair).

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Diuris-7-2017-11-11-15.06.22-ZS-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Diuris 7 2017 11 11 15.06.22 ZS PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 69 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 2107 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Diuris-7-2017-11-11-16.12.44-ZS-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Diuris 7 2017 11 11 16.12.44 ZS DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 69 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 1880 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Diuris-7-2017-11-11-16-14-23-A,Radius8,Smoothing4-.jpeg
Image title: Diuris 7 2017 11 11 16 14 23 A,Radius8,Smoothing4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 57 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 1148 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Diuris-7-2017-11-11-16-15-07-C-.jpeg
Image title: Diuris 7 2017 11 11 16 15 07 C
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 67 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 4426 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I wasn't able to get any results for Helicon B (depth map): every time I moved the mouse towards the button, the application crashed. Yes, a reinstall might help. But sorry, Helicon, you're just too unreliable.

Which is best? Zerene DMap has some very unpleasant artefacts in the stems on the right, so for this subject it's not worth talking about. The two Helicon results are surprisingly different in the background. But in general I can't find much wrong with any of them.

The other subject was this wildflower, which I've been observing for nearly a month. Again, run the cursor over an image to compare it with the other of the pair):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Wildflower-3-2017-11-11-16.46.11-ZS-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 3 2017 11 11 16.46.11 ZS PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 135 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3724 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Wildflower-3-2017-11-11-16.50.20-ZS-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 3 2017 11 11 16.50.20 ZS DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 130 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3318 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Wildflower-3-2017-11-11-16-52-09-A,Radius8,Smoothing4.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 3 2017 11 11 16 52 09 A,Radius8,Smoothing4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 113 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 2762 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171110/small/Wildflower-3-2017-11-11-16-53-09-C.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 3 2017 11 11 16 53 09 C
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 119 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 5338 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 10 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

All of these look acceptable to me. Again, the biggest difference is the rendering of the out-of-focus areas, though this time Zerene PMax is the one that stands out.

This time I also took the trouble to measure processing times. My estimate of 5 times as long for Zerene proved optimistic. For the Diuris, Helicon took 14 seconds with either method. Zerene DMap took 138 seconds, effectively 10 times as long. But it's the result that counts


Raclette again
Topic: food and drink Link here

I've decided against photos for Saturday evening dinner for a while, until I get my technique sorted out. It's somewhat disruptive as it is, and I continually run into trouble.

Today we had Raclette, not quite in keeping with the weather (temperatures touched 30° today), but we've only used the new grill once before, and it seemed like a good idea before we knew what the weather would be like.

Once again we noted the difference in the distance between element and pans. The old grill had so little space that it was easy to touch the element, though the pans were shallower. With this one I'm coming to the conclusion that the distance is too great, and we need something to lift the pans:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171112/small/Raclette-grill-4.jpeg
Image title: Raclette grill 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 756 x 357, 159 kB
Dimensions of original: 4644 x 2194, 2638 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 12 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171112/small/Raclette-grill-3.jpeg
Image title: Raclette grill 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 781 x 346, 134 kB
Dimensions of original: 4632 x 2052, 1770 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 12 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We'll find something better for next time.


Sunday, 12 November 2017 Dereel Images for 12 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Vignetting?
Topic: photography, opinion Link here

While taking photos of the bogged truck yesterday, I discovered some extreme vignetting when using the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 mm f/4.0 IS PRO at 12 mm. Tried again today under more controlled conditions, with what must surely be the most boring photos I have ever taken in earnest:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171111/small/12-100-12-fiter.jpeg
Image title: 12 100 12 fiter
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 39 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 720 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 11 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The mark in the middle is the shadow of the tripod, and is thus of no importance. This was the raw image with no conversions, taken with a filter on the lens. Was the filter responsible? Or is this vignetting something that is corrected in software, either in the out-of-camera JPEG image or with external software such as DxO PhotoLab? Tried that too, after removing the filter (which made no difference). Here first the JPEG, then DxO results:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171111/small/12-100-12-JPEG.jpeg
Image title: 12 100 12 JPEG
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 37 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 672 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 11 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171111/small/12-100-12-opt.jpeg
Image title: 12 100 12 opt
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 38 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 763 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 11 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

DxO does something, but not much. I'm beginning to wonder if something is wrong with the lens.


Scanning old photos again
Topic: photography Link here

I have yet another request for old photos that I took in Kuala Lumpur over 50 years ago. This time it's of plans my father drew in mid-1965:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/19650727/small/FLDA-house-3.jpeg
Image title: FLDA house 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 470 x 575, 93 kB
Dimensions of original: 2577 x 3150, 1079 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 27 July 1965:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/19650727/small/FLDA-house-6.jpeg
Image title: FLDA house 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 481 x 561, 93 kB
Dimensions of original: 2637 x 3075, 1044 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 27 July 1965:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That required rescanning, and I spent a lot of the day doing that, in the process refining my methods and discovering that I had many more films in my old negative album than I thought, like these forgettable photos from 19 February 1966:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/19660219/small/Hal-3.jpeg
Image title: Hal 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 662 x 408, 108 kB
Dimensions of original: 3335 x 2056, 1139 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 19 February 1966:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/19660219/small/Henton.jpeg
Image title: Henton
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 661 x 409, 61 kB
Dimensions of original: 3272 x 2024, 641 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 19 February 1966:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/19660219/small/Plum.jpeg
Image title: Plum
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 666 x 405, 77 kB
Dimensions of original: 3328 x 2024, 778 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 19 February 1966:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I had had my Asahi Pentax SV for over 6 months by that time. Why did I not get the first one in focus?


Chicken drumsticks sous vide
Topic: food and drink Link here

Grilled chicken drumsticks taste good, but it's really difficult to cook them correctly. Underdo them and the meat sticks to the joints. Overdo them and they get dry and stringy. And measuring the temperature is difficult.

Clearly a case for sous-vide cooking. So that's what I did yesterday, and today we grilled them. But things still aren't that simple. What temperature? Conventional wisdom (in other words, what I have written down) is that they should be cooked at 78°. But when I had done that, the juice coming out still looked pinkish, so I cooked some of them for another couple of hours at 80°.

Today the results were really visible:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171112/small/Drumsticks-78.jpeg
Image title: Drumsticks 78
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 448, 147 kB
Dimensions of original: 4640 x 3456, 3034 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 12 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171112/small/Drumsticks-80.jpeg
Image title: Drumsticks 80
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 448, 161 kB
Dimensions of original: 4640 x 3456, 3140 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 12 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The second group (of three) was cooked to 80°, and the skin round the thin end has pulled apart. And what difference did it make? Both sets were much juicier than conventional cooking methods, but neither was really “falling off the bone”. Next time I'll try some at 82°.


Reinstalling DxO
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Time to run DxO PhotoLab on euroa again. The installation is still broken, and remained broken after “uninstalling” it. But when I fought my way the maze of twisty little directories folders after deinstallation, the files were still there. OK, rm -rf /cygdrive/c/Users/grog/Local/DxO/ and reinstall.

It worked. What use are these deinstallers? OK, I had put stuff in there that hadn't been installed, but surely they can deal with that. At the very least they can report the fact.

Microsoft!


Monday, 13 November 2017 Dereel Images for 13 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Summer comes up like thunder
Topic: general, opinion Link here

Earlier this month we had frost. Now we have temperatures over 30°, which came in at an amazing rate:

Click to see larger image

At 7:08, the outside temperature was 13°. An hour later, at 8:10, it was 24°. That's quite impressive.


JG King responds
Topic: Stones Road house Link here

Got JG King's reply to my complaint today. I got the feeling that they didn't read it, and just restated their letter I received over two years ago. They even mentioned the bandaid to the floor levels that we had agreed on back then, and which was not part of my complaint. About the only new thing that they seem to have come up with was the windows: the contract specifies double glazing throughout, but some of the windows are single-glazed. Their statement (verbatim): “This was not raised on my inspection of the home but windows are as per contract”. And that's all. The sad thing is that this kind of lack of attention doesn't seem to do people any harm.


Hibiscus photos: finally!
Topic: photography, gardening, technology, opinion Link here

It's been over 18 months since I started trying to take focus-stacked photos of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis flowers. So far technology has always got the better of me. Today I had another go, and finally I have a couple of photos which are almost acceptable:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171113/small/Hibiscus-2-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Hibiscus 2 DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 136 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2766 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 13 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171113/small/Hibiscus-3-2017-11-13-17.47.46-ZS-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Hibiscus 3 2017 11 13 17.47.46 ZS DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 105 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1971 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 13 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I need to look at it in more detail, but I don't see any artefacts. About the only issue is the depth of field. In each case, I took 20 shots, the first at f/4 (a little wide for this lens) and the second at f/5.6. But the first one was further away, and I ended up with almost the entire background sharp. The second, despite the smaller aperture, was only barely sharp to the back of the flower. I really need to create some tools to calculate the number of steps necessary.


Auxiliary viewfinder monitor
Topic: photography Link here

On numerous occasions I've complained about the lack of an adequate viewfinder for my cameras when taking macros. Yes, they all have at least two viewfinders, and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark I can have three. But they're all connected to the camera body, which makes them difficult to use in situations like these:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171014/small/Wildflower-photos-1.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower photos 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 604 x 447, 229 kB
Dimensions of original: 4668 x 3456, 7288 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 14 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171024/small/Macro-photography-1.jpeg
Image title: Macro photography 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 272 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 5218 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 24 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171021/small/Photos-1.jpeg
Image title: Photos 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 478 x 564, 252 kB
Dimensions of original: 3384 x 3992, 6697 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 21 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But the cameras have an HDMI output. Years ago I connected my GPS navigator to my Olympus E-30, and it worked. That was a composite input, but surely there are HDMI monitors out there.

Went looking and opened a can of worms. The cheapest I could find had the “standard” resolution of 800×480 and cost $56, and it seemed to do the job—until I discovered that it did not have a battery. The cheapest with battery cost $102, and it had a resolution of 1024×600. But then there was one from Viltrox, a name I know, specifically intended for my purpose, with flash shoe mount and sun shade. It also promises “pixel magnification” and focus peaking, which might also be usable. By this time the price has risen to three times the el-cheapo model, but maybe it's worth it.

Then I made the mistake of looking for reviews. Before long I had this review:

Another feature of interest is genuine 1920×1080 resolution (something that the cameras can output). But it seems that even the battery-operated models frequently come with neither battery nor charger. Somehow this search is getting more complicated than I thought.


Tuesday, 14 November 2017 Dereel Images for 14 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

More viewfinder investigations
Topic: photography, technology Link here

Spent quite a bit more time investigating viewfinder monitors today. There's an amazing choice. Some of the better ones seem to come from a company with the unlikely name Feelworld, which calls them “on-camera monitors” or “HDMI Camera Field Monitors”. But which? The current list (probably predestined to link rot) lists no fewer than 19 different models, in addition to 18 “SDI Field Monitors”. They differ at least in resolution and screen size. But even after limiting to 7" diagonal and 1920×1080 resolution, I'm left with 5 different monitors, with an actual resolution of 1920×1200. Why do they use this aspect ratio? More importantly, though, what are the differences? They don't offer a comparison. The differences I see are availability (I've only seen two of them available on line), and controls: some have a row of prominent control buttons, others don't.

The two that I could find are the FW760 and the FH7, with buttons, and the T7 (“New”), without buttons. What are the other differences? I don't know. The FW760 is clearly older, but it has the buttons, and also reviews, such as this one:

That shows a number of issues:

The last issue is a problem, but some people are offering kits with battery and charger. Prices in this configuration are round $230. Is it worth it? I think that it makes sense to have 1920×1080 (or 1200) resolution, The cheapest I can find there are round $170 without battery, from a company called Eyoyo, and the descriptions I have found haven't been very convincing. But clearly I'm not done yet.


ON1: No thanks
Topic: technology, photography Link here

Recently I heard of a company called ON1, who have just released a new version of their photo software. OK, I can try that. Fought my way through their web site: I needed to provide my (one-off) email address before they would talk to me, and for that I needed to tell them about myself and what kind (only one) of photos I took.

Finally I was registered, logged in and... had to tell them all over again. My guess is that this is a case of Hanlon's Razor.

Finally installed the software, and got the message:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171114/small/ON1.png
Image title: ON1          Dimensions:          916 x 295, 68 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Tuesday, 14 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Tuesday, 14 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Tuesday, 14 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

And they didn't think of that before? I don't mind trying out new software, but they shouldn't make it difficult. Not only do they not check what's needed, they don't tell me how to install it. Goodbye, ON1.


Ibis visit
Topic: animals, photography Link here

Found a lone Ibis wandering round in the garden this evening, accompanied by an inquisitive Magpie:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171114/small/Ibis-3.jpeg
Image title: Ibis 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 596 x 453, 178 kB
Dimensions of original: 1796 x 1364, 778 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 14 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171114/small/Ibis-9.jpeg
Image title: Ibis 9
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 569 x 475, 182 kB
Dimensions of original: 1417 x 1182, 612 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 14 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171114/small/Ibis-12.jpeg
Image title: Ibis 12
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 744 x 362, 209 kB
Dimensions of original: 2420 x 1179, 1109 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 14 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They tend to be pretty gregarious, and I suspect he had lost his flock.


Wednesday, 15 November 2017 Dereel Images for 15 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Garden flowers in late spring
Topic: gardening Link here

Middle of the month again, time for my monthly garden flower photos. Last month things were rather depressing, but things are looking a lot better now. The Paulownia kawakamii that had suffered so much in the frost earlier this month seems to be coming back strong. Here two weeks ago and today:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171106/small/Paulownia-3.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 171 kB
Dimensions of original: 4610 x 3456, 2787 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 6 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Paulownia.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 189 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 3784 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Paulownia-2.jpeg
Image title: Paulownia 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 182 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3389 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The last image shows leaves that completely disappeared 10 days ago.

The Banksia that had suffered frost damage last month has also recovered well. Here the first two from last month, and now today:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171012/small/Banksia-1.jpeg
Image title: Banksia 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 449 x 601, 185 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5204, 5055 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 12 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171012/small/Banksia-3.jpeg
Image title: Banksia 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 449, 141 kB
Dimensions of original: 5192 x 3888, 3554 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 12 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Banksia-2.jpeg
Image title: Banksia 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 176 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5185, 5121 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Senna aciphylla that we planted last December has not only lasted out the winter: it's still flowering, something that we never saw in Kleins Road:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Senna-aciphylla.jpeg
Image title: Senna aciphylla
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 105 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2188 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And the roses are flowering profusely, notably this climber:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Rose-3.jpeg
Image title: Rose 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 288 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5185, 9029 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's a pity that it doesn't have a nicer colour.

The more established roses are also coming up well:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Rose-7.jpeg
Image title: Rose 7
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 164 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3746 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Rose-8.jpeg
Image title: Rose 8
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 268 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 7113 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Rose-9.jpeg
Image title: Rose 9
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 289 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 8912 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But the ones in the new bed are not:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Rose-4.jpeg
Image title: Rose 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 448 x 603, 287 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5230, 11851 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I'm not sure why that's the case.

The tree ferns are coming back, though the first one seemed to be nearly dead, and I'm not sure that it will make it. But the other has come out with new fronds, late but strong:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Tree-fern-1.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 242 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 5296 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Tree-fern-3.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 301 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 8071 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Tree-fern-4.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 141 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3889, 4077 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Adenanthos sericeus (“wooly bushes”) that we planted behind the riding arena are gradually growing, despite the grass around them:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Adenanthos-sericeus-1.jpeg
Image title: Adenanthos sericeus 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 247 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 5170 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Adenanthos-sericeus-2.jpeg
Image title: Adenanthos sericeus 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 135 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 3639 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Another plant that has taken its time is an Anigozanthos (“Kangaroo paw”) that the Marriotts gave us a couple of years ago, which Sasha then mutilated, and we nurtured back to health. It's doing very well now:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Anigozanthos.jpeg
Image title: Anigozanthos
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 261 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3890, 7777 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Anigozanthos.jpeg
Image title: Anigozanthos
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 67 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1763 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

This one was a surprise:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grass-1.jpeg
Image title: Grass 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 3890 x 5184, 3936 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grass-2.jpeg
Image title: Grass 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 111 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 2178 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's a grass that Yvonne bought years ago for the colour of its foliage. We didn't know that it would flower like that.

A year and a half ago we also planted a couple of crawling Grevilleas in the D bed. Neither has done very well, but this one now finally seems to be coming:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grevillea-1.jpeg
Image title: Grevillea 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 277 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 8995 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grevillea-2.jpeg
Image title: Grevillea 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 263 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 6527 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Grevillea bronwenae that we bought in Pomonal last month doesn't seem to have changed much, but appearances are deceptive. It's coming up with lots of new buds:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grevillea-3.jpeg
Image title: Grevillea 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 272 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 7392 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And the Eremophila nivea that we bought at the same time has also carried on flowering, though I suspect it would like less wind:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Eremophila-nivea.jpeg
Image title: Eremophila nivea
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 254 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 7968 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Hebe that was looking so sick last month is no longer looking sick. It's dead. But others are looking very good, notably this one:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Hebe-1.jpeg
Image title: Hebe 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 310 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 7273 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

On the south (shade) side of the house, the Vinca minor seem to be taking over:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Vinca-minor-1.jpeg
Image title: Vinca minor 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 449, 247 kB
Dimensions of original: 5215 x 3888, 6357 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Vinca-minor-2.jpeg
Image title: Vinca minor 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 190 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4529 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Buddlejas have had different results. These two are in a row together, about 3 m apart:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Buddleja-1.jpeg
Image title: Buddleja 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 262 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 8245 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Buddleja-2.jpeg
Image title: Buddleja 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 160 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 3249 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's not clear why the second is so sick, but hopefully it'll recover this year.

And this plant (wildflower? weed?) probably needs more attention:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Wildflower.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 238 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 4790 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I've seen it before, but never really had time to investigate it.


Planting Clematis
Topic: gardening Link here

I've been dragging my feet about the Clematis plants that I bought the weekend before last. Part of the issue is erecting the trellis, for which I have found various grounds for procrastination. The other was the discovery that the Mandevilla laxa that I had wanted to replace was in fact not quite dead:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Mandevilla-laxa.jpeg
Image title: Mandevilla laxa
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 243 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 6651 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So I ended up planting one Clematis (a General Sikorski cultivar, pruning group 2) a little to the left:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Clematis.jpeg
Image title: Clematis
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 276 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 8854 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That wasn't as simple as it seemed. Clematis tie themselves in knots, and on removing the plant from the pot, I managed to break one of the two stems:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Clematis-2.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 94 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3890, 3076 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Clematis-1.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 5206 x 3888, 4086 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The flowers came into a vase, and I've planted the lower part in soil. We'll see if it takes root or not.


Black hole Sunshine West
Topic: general, opinion Link here

Received another parcel today which had spent the last 5 days maturing in Sunshine West:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/auspost-tracking.png
Image title: auspost tracking
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 701 x 385, 73 kB
Dimensions of original: 1135 x 624, 66 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

After turning the right way round, I established:

I've noted this before, but I never cease to be amazed. There must be some good business reason for this, but I don't see it. Is there really that little postal traffic between Melbourne and Ballarat? I'd love to find a plausible official explanation.


New display card for teevee
Topic: technology, multimedia Link here

The package that Australia Post so lovingly matured was a display card for teevee, my multimedia box (or TV driver). Yes, of course it has a display card, but it's full height, and I wanted to migrate teevee to a Lenovo ThinkCentre:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/TV-2.jpeg
Image title: TV 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 169 kB
Dimensions of original: 5199 x 3888, 5126 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/TV-2-detail.jpeg
Image title: TV 2 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 484 x 557, 127 kB
Dimensions of original: 1718 x 1977, 760 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

How do I migrate easily and with fallback? I can't even just take out the disks from teevee and put them in the new machine (provisionally called tiwi): if something goes wrong, I'll have to rebuild again, and I won't have the option of comparing how they behave. In any case, there are two disks, and the ThinkCentre can only hold one.

The right way is to install a new operating system on a new disk, and use that. But that takes time and requires configuration. Instead I got an old disk and simply overwrote it with the contents of teevee's root file system. And how about that, it worked!

Put in the display card, which fortunately fit:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/TV-4.jpeg
Image title: TV 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 686 x 394, 156 kB
Dimensions of original: 4681 x 2689, 2346 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Fired up X. How about that, it worked out of the box! And yes, I could watch TV on it. One of the most painless rebuilds I've had.

Moved it to the lounge room and connected to the TV. Yes, that worked too, including the sensitive things like the remote control. About the only issues were files that were dependent on the host name, like ~/.xmodmap.tiwi and ~/.xmodmap.teevee. But all very minor.

But then I tried to watch a film, and I noted random artefacts, almost like scratches on a film. And from time to time the TV blacked out and took a few seconds to resync.

What causes that? The obvious culprit is the TV, with which I've had fun in the past. Connected up teevee (see, it's good to have a fallback), and things worked correctly.

X configuration? I hadn't changed it from the old config, but surprisingly that was correct. It turned out that the new card is electrically almost identical to the old one. The dmesg output is really identical:

nvidia-modeset: Loading NVIDIA Kernel Mode Setting Driver for UNIX platforms  384.90  Tue Sep 19 17:29:32 PDT 2017
nexus0
nvidia0: <GeForce GT 710> on vgapci0
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
vgapci0: Boot video device

What about /var/log/Xorg.0.log? Normally it's almost impossible to compare the two, but this time there were very minor differences, mainly related to the fact that I had inadvertently put in two sets of font specifications:

[    28.494] (**) FontPath set to:
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF,
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,
        /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/misc/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/TTF/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/OTF/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/Type1/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/100dpi/,
        /usr/local/share/fonts/75dpi/

That's clearly not the problem: in fact, this works on tiwi, while teevee doesn't appear to have the path /usr/local/bin/X11/fonts.

The most obvious issue would be differences in the frequencies of the output signal. But not only was the output similar enough to be easy to compare, there was no significant difference at all. About the only real difference was the fact that the old card also has a VGA output, so there was more information about the fact that it was connected.

OK, try 3. xvidtune. Oh. Can't run it over the network. But the man page shows me that there's a -show option, which just prints out a mode line, all that I wanted. Try that:

=== grog@teevee (/dev/pts/4) ~ 3 -> xvidtune -show
"1920x1080"   148.50   1920 2008 2052 2200   1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync
=== grog@tiwi (/dev/pts/4) ~ 5 -> xvidtune -show
"1920x1080"   148.50   1920 2008 2052 2200   1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync

They're identical!

What does this leave me with. Defective HDMI cable? Maybe the card has a defective HDMI output: I tried it via DVI in the office, and it worked there. Dirty connection? The obvious first thing would be to reseat the cable, reboot the machine, and see if the problem still occurs. If it does, try the new card in teevee and see what happens there.


eBay “make an offer”
Topic: general, photography, photography Link here

So I've decided to buy a FW760 camera (“field”) monitor. Caution is required: the standard offering comes with neither battery, charger (obviously) nor micro HDMI cable, though there are bundles with those “accessories”. The cheapest bundle I could find on eBay was for $225, but that was a bid, not “Buy it now”. The cheapest “Buy it now” was from LinkDelight for $230 or “Best offer”. OK, what's a reasonable offer? Sent off an offer for $220, which was refused. At the same time, they raised the price to $246! Sent off a stiff comment offering $225 as last offer, and got a counter-offer of $239.

Sorry, LinkDelight, this isn't the way to delight your customers. I'd rather pay more and buy elsewhere.


Pizza with mozzarella
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Pizza again for dinner today, although we had it less than two weeks ago. But on Sunday Yvonne was at Heldane's Icelandic stud on Sunday, colocated with Shaw River Buffalo Cheese: Amy Heldane does the horses, and her sister Thea Royal does the cheese, some of the only buffalo cheese in Australia. So of course Yvonne brought some Mozzarella back with her:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Pizza-3.jpeg
Image title: Pizza 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 524 x 514, 206 kB
Dimensions of original: 3636 x 3570, 3502 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Pizza-4.jpeg
Image title: Pizza 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 526 x 514, 220 kB
Dimensions of original: 3744 x 3656, 4413 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Once again I had difficulty with the dough: I had to add about 7% to the stated quantities. I had a similar problem last week, which I attributed to incorrect measurements. Is this a problem with the different flour that I hadn't noticed before?


Thursday, 16 November 2017 Dereel Images for 16 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Rain!
Topic: gardening, animals Link here

Yesterday I took my monthly garden flower photos, but only today things had changed completely. We had nearly 30 mm of rain, causing near-flooding in front of the house, despite all the precautions we had done earlier in the spring:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-3.jpeg
Image title: Rain 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 187 kB
Dimensions of original: 5199 x 3888, 6595 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-4.jpeg
Image title: Rain 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 449, 232 kB
Dimensions of original: 5215 x 3888, 7009 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-5.jpeg
Image title: Rain 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3943 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Piccola was not amused:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Piccola-1.jpeg
Image title: Piccola 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 249 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 6618 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Piccola-2.jpeg
Image title: Piccola 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 219 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 5358 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Piccola-3.jpeg
Image title: Piccola 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 203 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 5282 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That also emphasized a problem that we've had in the central bed for some time:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-1.jpeg
Image title: Rain 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 604 x 447, 281 kB
Dimensions of original: 5254 x 3888, 9826 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-2.jpeg
Image title: Rain 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 185 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3659 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The patch of green in the first photo is the creeping Grevillea that I mentioned yesterday:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grevillea-1.jpeg
Image title: Grevillea 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 277 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 8995 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Grevillea-2.jpeg
Image title: Grevillea 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 263 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 6527 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But the second photo shows its partner, planted at the same time, but subject to repeated drowning. It's only barely alive: time for some rescue.

The pile of soil that Jamie delivered last week was in the drain from the road. We knew that at the time, and my response was “Hopefully Warrick will make it here before the next rain”. He didn't:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-8.jpeg
Image title: Rain 8
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 449 x 600, 186 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5199, 6850 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The other thing that is becoming clear is that the drain from the street via the entrance isn't ideal. On the one hand it's clear that the entrance should be wider to cater for trailers coming round the corner, and on the other hand there's a natural drain to the left of the driveway:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-9.jpeg
Image title: Rain 9
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 224 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 10289 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Rain-10.jpeg
Image title: Rain 10
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 607 x 445, 255 kB
Dimensions of original: 5306 x 3888, 12724 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Completing tiwi
Topic: multimedia, technology, opinion Link here

Yesterday's upgrade attempts for teevee were almost completely successful, except for the issues with the display. I established a procedure, and today I tried it out.

First, connect the cables again, paying special attention to the seat of the HDMI cable. And it worked! Was it really just a badly sitting cable? After some consideration, I've decided “yes”.

Next step is to move the physical disks around. My media are still on teevee, which is less than optimal.


More ibises
Topic: animals Link here

Our solitary Ibis hasn't returned. Presumably he found his mates:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Ducks-ibises.jpeg
Image title: Ducks ibises          Dimensions:          1365 x 198, 159 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 16 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 16 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 16 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

 


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/Ducks-ibises-1-detail.jpeg
Image title: Ducks ibises 1 detail          Dimensions:          1502 x 180, 194 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 16 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 16 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 16 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 


Trellis: finally
Topic: gardening Link here

It's been nearly two weeks since we bought the new Clematis plants, and a week since we bought the trellis. Time to put the trellis up? Yes. And it went smoothly. The biggest problem was untangling the plant (an Edo murasaki cultivar, pruning group 2) without breaking off anything significant. I managed that, but we lost all the petals on the two flowers. Still, it's in place now:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Trellis-4.jpeg
Image title: Trellis 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 604 x 447, 214 kB
Dimensions of original: 5254 x 3888, 8085 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Trellis-2.jpeg
Image title: Trellis 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 228 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 6672 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Trellis-5.jpeg
Image title: Trellis 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 447 x 604, 225 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5254, 7170 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
The soil was pretty wet, but hopefully that'll go in a matter of hours.

LinkDelight: revenge is sweet
Topic: general, technology, photography Link here

I was really upset by the way, far from accepting my “best offer” on eBay, LinkDelight increased the “Buy it now” price of the FW760 monitor from $230 to $247. But they also had one on auction, initial bid $225. OK, wait until the end and then buy... for $225, the price they had rejected yesterday. That feels good.

To be fair to LinkDelight, their price was probably really too low. But if you offer “Buy it Now” and “Best Offer”, you shouldn't increase the price when people make an offer, at least not for that one person.


Friday, 17 November 2017 Dereel Images for 17 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

teevee: Finishing touches
Topic: multimedia, technology, general Link here

Yesterday's work on tiwi.lemis.com (the new teevee) was successful but not complete. I still needed to move disks around and put the new box in the TV cabinet.

teevee has had two disks for a remarkably short period of time. My last upgrade started on 1 June and took over 3 weeks to complete. By comparison, this time was a breeze.

Last time round I added a new boot disk to teevee, leaving the old one untouched. That proved to be useful today: I was able to copy the entire root file system to it, greatly simplifying the transition. In fact, about the biggest problem was physically moving the machine from its provisional position to inside the cabinet:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171116/small/TV-2.jpeg
Image title: TV 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 169 kB
Dimensions of original: 5199 x 3888, 5126 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 16 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171118/small/TV-2.jpeg
Image title: TV 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 632 x 427, 149 kB
Dimensions of original: 5284 x 3573, 3043 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 18 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That also involved swapping names: the new machine became teevee, and the old one became tiwi. Of course, in the three months' life of the previous incarnation I accumulated something like 300 GB of content on the second disk, and I needed to move it to the system disk. That involved some finger trouble (note: don't NFS mount a file system on the same system). And then hours of moving files across the network. But it's working! For the first time in the over 13 years since I started using computers to drive TVs, I have a system that doesn't look (that) abnormal.


Boot problems?
Topic: technology Link here

Although I had no real problems setting up the new teevee, there was one strange issue. On boot I got an unexpected message:

gptboot: Invalid backup GPT header

That looks like some kind of data corruption on disk, and that's all that I found on the web. It's benign in the sense that it doesn't stop the machine from working, but it would be interesting to find out how to fix it.


More wildflowers
Topic: gardening Link here

I've identified nearly 30 individual Thelymitra pauciflora (“sun orchid”) plants growing in the 400 odd metres of nature strip on Stones Road north of here:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-1.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 176 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3372 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-1-detail.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 1 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 336 x 804, 104 kB
Dimensions of original: 1013 x 2425, 360 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They're amazingly difficult to recognize, and I keep walking past them. They flower only briefly, but I want to be there when they do. Here's a typical location:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-4.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 250 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 11181 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Yes, that looks like a Grevillea rosmarinifolia, not a Thelymitra pauciflora. And it is, easy to recognize. At front left, though, is a Thelymitra, and this photo is to help me locate it. The plant itself is here:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-4-detail.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 4 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 290 x 933, 170 kB
Dimensions of original: 283 x 910, 160 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Apart from that, I find I should be paying more attention to insignificant plants. Here's one I found just outside the driveway:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Wildflower.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 167 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 9595 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Wildflower-detail.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 542 x 498, 112 kB
Dimensions of original: 298 x 274, 69 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Is it indigenous? Native? Exotic? I don't know, but I suppose I should find out.


Saturday, 18 November 2017 Dereel Images for 18 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Garden update
Topic: gardening Link here

A couple of days ago I noted with pleasure the recovery of the tiny tree fern that we bought last year and which had suffered from the bore water spray:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171115/small/Tree-fern-1.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 242 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 5296 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 15 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But today it doesn't look anything near as good:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171118/small/Tree-fern-3.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 265 kB
Dimensions of original: 3890 x 5184, 5740 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 18 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Where is it? You need to look much closer:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171118/small/Tree-fern-4.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 159 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 2976 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 18 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Tree-fern-remains.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern remains
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 193 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 9303 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Mick the gardener was here today, and he didn't see it while whipper-snipping. He did see a patch of weeds next to it (towards the bottom of the image), and carefully avoided them:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171118/small/Tree-fern-2.jpeg
Image title: Tree fern 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 297 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 7903 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 18 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

He also planted the “Baby's tears” ground cover in front of the house, first tearing it into six pieces:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171118/small/Front-garden-2.jpeg
Image title: Front garden 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 448 x 603, 237 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5230, 9389 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 18 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Still, I suppose accidents will happen. I wonder if the tree fern will recover. Should I even try, or just buy a new one?


An end to “blogs”?
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

I've been keeping an online diary for over 17 years now, following on from a paper diary that I kept for nearly 8 years in the 1960s. In March 2009 I was informed that my “blog” had been added to the ACM Queue blog roll. Blog? I don't have no steenking blog. In fact, I created one to make my point.

Where does the word “blog” come from? “Weblog”, of course. Even the Oxford English Dictionary describes the term in detail, including this reference (under weblog):

1997 J. Barger Lively New Webpage in alt.culture.www (Usenet newsgroup) 23 Dec. I decided to start my own webpage logging the best stuff I find as I surf, on a daily basis:..www.mcs.net/~jorn/html/weblog.html.

Typically, that URL is now 404.

I chose to limit my diary for ACM: much of what I do is of no interest to their readers. And for quite some time I've been one of the most regular contributors. Looking back over the life of the blog roll (about 8½ years), I contributed 3,280 of the total 13,628 posts, about 24%. That's about 32 a month out of about 135 a month.

But times have changed. Today there were (so far this month) 35 posts, 28 by me. Last month (the last complete month) there were 47 posts, 36 by me. My average hasn't changed, but the overall average has dropped by round two thirds.

That's not just the last month or two. In June 2016 (the first month for which I can get statistics), there were 53 posts, 30 by me. In those 18 months the other contributions have dropped from 23 per month to 11 per month.

Where have all the bloggers gone? It seems that in this day of smart phones, typing has become “too difficult” (for once I'm in agreement), and people prefer more ephemeral means of communication. If Facebook isn't bad enough, consider Snapchat, a company with a philosophy that goes against all that I hold dear. Or, if you're a politician, there's always Twitter to limit your output to match your attention span.

I suppose blogs will go the way of USENET, with archived content and very little new content. I wonder how we'll communicate in 10 years' time.


Sunday, 19 November 2017 Dereel Images for 19 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Object schema-validation controller throttled?
Topic: technology Link here

Tim Bray wrote an article yesterday days ago about the image quality of his Pixel 2 as processed by various software. Interesting, but not spectacular. How would a real camera have handled it? Decided to leave a comment. But of course there was a form to fill out. Did that (“How many sides does a triangle have?” Three, of course), and got an error message:

Insertion Aborted
Error: Object schema-validation controller throttled; exiting.

Huh? Deliberately obfuscated “error message”? It seems so. Subsequent attempts (including replacing “three” with “3”) brought no joy, but interesting variants on the error message:

Configuration Interrupted
Error: Subsystem normalization controller failed health check; exiting.

Initialization Problem
Error: Model parse controller has invalid index; exiting.

Queuing Malfunction
Error: Origin consistency-check initializer not authenticated; exiting.

Creation Malfunction
Error: Module synchronization activator mismatch; exiting.

Update Problem
Error: Microservice marshalling responder missing; exiting.

I wonder what the real problem was.


Leucospermum flowering
Topic: gardening, photography Link here

The Leucospermum cordifolium in front of my office window is gradually starting to flower:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Leucospermum-cordifolium-3.-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Leucospermum cordifolium 3. PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 133 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3565 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

This is a halfway stage before all the stalks extend.

This also gave me another chance to take a focus stacked image, this time hand-held with 20 exposures. I can't see any evidence that Zerene had trouble with it, though it's gradually becoming clear that PMax creates cleaner backgrounds than DMap. Here PMax, then DMap (run the cursor over an image to compare it with its neighbour):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Leucospermum-cordifolium-3.-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Leucospermum cordifolium 3. PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 133 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3565 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Leucospermum-cordifolium-3.-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Leucospermum cordifolium 3. DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 134 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3390 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The other issue that I still need to address is the relatively flat output. Here the PMax variant in comparison with a single image:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Leucospermum-cordifolium-3.-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Leucospermum cordifolium 3. PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 133 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3565 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Leucospermum-cordifolium-2.jpeg
Image title: Leucospermum cordifolium 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 149 kB
Dimensions of original: 4612 x 3456, 3172 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

In this case, the single image might be preferable, though clearly the depth of field is insufficient.


Revisiting old focus stacks
Topic: photography, technology Link here

I'm gradually getting to the stage where my Zerene results are sufficient for most purposes. What about my older attempts? Can it help there? My first attempts at manual focus stacking go back nearly 5 years, but on that occasion I had to give up because my software wasn't up to it. Today I got:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20121214/small/Garden-flowers.PMax.jpeg
Image title: Garden flowers.PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 194 kB
Dimensions of original: 4032 x 3024, 2735 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 14 December 2012:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's not perfect by a long shot. It can't be: I only had two images, and there's an intermediate area that is out of focus in both shots. But it works, and in this case there's no significant colour or gradation difference.

Then, on 18 June 2015, I tried to merge a series of images of a Eucalyptus flower. By this time I had the version 4 firmware for the Olympus OM-D E-M1, but problems with DxO Optics “Pro” stopped me by giving me converted images with different sizes. That's still an issue, but now my scripts correct for it:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20150616/small/Eucalyptus-flower-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Eucalyptus flower PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 92 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 1541 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 16 June 2015:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

In this case, the default DMax image has an even worse background:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20150616/small/Eucalyptus-flower-DMap.jpeg
Image title: Eucalyptus flower DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 93 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 1391 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 16 June 2015:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Started reading the documentation, which suggests that DMax really requires tuning to get good results, but that they can then be very good.


Bloody autofocus!
Topic: photography, animals, opinion Link here

Another series of horse riding videos today, like the ones I took three months ago. I wasn't keen: I had had serious focus issues last time, and I didn't know how to fix it. But Chris and Yvonne were insistent, so out again, this time with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 mm f/4.0 IS PRO, using a medium-sized focus area and autofocus with tracking. And how about that, with one minor glitch the camera kept focus.

Or at least, it claimed to have done so. The focus system showed a green frame round one of the horse heads that tracked perfectly. But it was lying: the image didn't stay in focus, like here at about 1:20:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171119/small/Chris-Yvonne-focus.png
Image title: Chris Yvonne focus
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 686 x 393, 424 kB
Dimensions of original: 1930 x 1106, 2045 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 19 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's really frustrating. What do I do?


Buddlejas: the fat and the lean
Topic: gardening, opinion Link here

A year and a half ago we planted five Buddleja saplings to the south of the house. Their fate has been varied. The two at the end both died. One did really well, and the others look like they have barely grown. Here the westmost two:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/Buddleja-1-detail.jpeg
Image title: Buddleja 1 detail          Dimensions:          953 x 283, 213 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Monday, 20 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Monday, 20 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Monday, 20 November 2017 Complete exposure details

   
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/Buddleja-2.jpeg
Image title: Buddleja 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 254 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 9183 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 20 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's difficult to recognize the small one; it's at the extreme left of the first image, and the bottom of the second one. Why has it done so badly? My best guess is that the soil there is really poor, and there were no nutrients. I've fixed that now, and we'll see how (if) things improve.


Monday, 20 November 2017 Dereel Images for 20 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Wikimedia error messages
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Some while back I linked to some images on Wikimedia. Today I discovered that one wasn't loading. My loading mechanism includes some JavaScript magic, so all I saw was a “loading” message that took too long.

OK, follow the link manually. A remarkably vague error message taking up the entire height of a 2560×1440 screen:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/WP-error-message-1.png
Image title: WP error message 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 678 x 399, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 1342 x 789, 80 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 20 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

OK, page down...


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/WP-error-message-2.png
Image title: WP error message 2          Dimensions:          857 x 315, 50 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Monday, 20 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Monday, 20 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Monday, 20 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

Wouldn't you think that they would have found a better way to report that particular error? The one they mention is Just Plain Wrong.


Wildflower photos
Topic: gardening, photography Link here

It's only been 3 days since I noticed this wildflower:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Wildflower.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 167 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 9595 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They shot up all over the place, and I had planned some macro photos of them. But only today they seem to have finished flowering. Grabbed a couple and took them into the office, where I got at least one reasonable photo:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/Wildflower-1-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 1 PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 42 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 868 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 20 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Oh. That's not the same plant. Friday's flower looked like this:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171117/small/Wildflower-detail.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 542 x 498, 112 kB
Dimensions of original: 298 x 274, 69 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 17 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

OK, still worth photographing. But it's really not easy. I'm gradually coming to the conclusion that the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II focus peaking fails badly with extreme macros. And how many steps? How many times have I asked that? Once I expressed the opinion that a default of 99 steps was ridiculously many, but now it seems that it's only rather silly to say 99 and not 100. This image was taken with 20 images, and it's clear that only the closer half is in focus.

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/Wildflower-6-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 6 PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 1955 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 20 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The colour balance and contrast are also rather strange. This is a primarily white flower, but it looks almost grey. That's particularly obvious looking from the front, where at least most of the flower is in focus:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171120/small/Wildflower-7-PMax.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 7 PMax
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2131 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 20 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So what do I need to do? Optimize exposure and work out how many images to take. Yes, I could take many more, but somehow that goes against the grain. It must be possible to calculate the number of steps. But there are still too many unknowns.


Upgrading mplayer
Topic: multimedia, technology Link here

One issue I still have with teevee is “tearing” of the displayed image on images that pan (horizontally). That's a common complaint, but in my case it started after my upgrade in June, where the software stayed the same and the hardware got faster. No obvious reason why it should start tearing.

Went searching on the web and found the usual recommendations, including VDPAU. Looking at my wrapper scripts, I found that I didn't specify VDPAU anywhere. Try out with explicit -vo vdpau and got:

=== grog@tiwi (/dev/pts/1) /teevee/spool/Series/Deutschen 24 -> /home/local/bin/mplayered -vo vdpau Die-Deutschen-II-\(6_9\)-20171004-153000.mp4
MPlayer SVN-r37862-snapshot-3.4.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team

Playing Die-Deutschen-II-(6_9)-20171004-153000.mp4.
libavformat version 57.36.100 (internal)
libavformat file format detected.
[mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x215a810]Protocol name not provided, cannot determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access patterns cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol
[lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
[lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang deu
VIDEO:  [H264]  1280x720  24bpp  25.000 fps  3155.9 kbps (385.2 kbyte/s)
Error opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device.
Clip info:
 major_brand: mp42
 minor_version: 1
 compatible_brands: isommp42
 creation_time: 2017-09-28 09:16:17
 copyright:
 copyright-eng:
Load subtitles in ./
SUB: Could not determine file format
Cannot load subtitles './Die-Deutschen-II-(6_9)-20171004-153000.txt'.
==========================================================================
Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
libavcodec version 57.39.100 (internal)
AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 2 ch, floatle, 128.0 kbit/4.17% (ratio: 16000->384000)
Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
==========================================================================
AO: [oss] 48000Hz 2ch s16le (2 bytes per sample)
Video: no video
Starting playback...
Error opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device.
A:   0.0 (00.0) of 2610.0 (43:29.9) ??,?%

Why that? In any case, it looked like a good time to upgrade my mplayer, not made easier by the requirement to merge my own patches. But that went relatively easily. This time I created a directory hierarchy /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer-local, copied the contents of /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer to it, and then merged my own patches. Surprisingly, it worked out of the box. And the total build time for mplayer was a little over a minute, quite surprising with today's bloated ports.

And it worked. In particular, I didn't need to specify -vo vdpau: the tearing went away without it. Is it invoked by default, perhaps?

It wasn't until we were watching TV in the evening that I discovered that the remote control didn't work. But that almost seems normal; somehow LIRC seems to have it in for me.


Tuesday, 21 November 2017 Dereel Images for 21 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Propagating Clematis
Topic: gardening Link here

While planting the Clematis “General Sikorski”, I managed to break off one of the stems. Damn! So I cut off the bottom of the broken-off piece, prepared it with scraping and hormone and planted it in a pot. Not surprisingly, it's not looking very happy at the moment:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Clematis-1.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 138 kB
Dimensions of original: 4610 x 3456, 2465 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

While watering the plant itself, noted that the remnant stem was lying on the ground:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Clematis-5.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 223 kB
Dimensions of original: 4609 x 3456, 3667 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So I tried to lift it up. And it wouldn't come. It had developed a root and attached itself to the ground:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Clematis-4.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 185 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4611, 2880 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So: it seems that to propagate Clematis, you need to cover one of these nodes with soil. Not what I had done:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Clematis-3.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 449, 150 kB
Dimensions of original: 4614 x 3456, 2340 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Still, I can fix that—maybe, if it's not too late:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Clematis-6.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 139 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 2561 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We'll see how that goes. Apart from that, there's also the stem with the flowers on it, which I put in a vase. To my surprise, the flowers lasted nearly a week, though they're clearly past it now:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171122/small/Clematis-1.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 164 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4609, 3217 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 22 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But after trimming the flowers off, it seems that it, too, has developed vestigial roots:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171122/small/Clematis-6.jpeg
Image title: Clematis 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 98 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3244 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 22 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So that'll soak in water for a while, and then I'll plant it.


Sun orchids: finally
Topic: gardening Link here

While walking the dogs today, found what I have been looking for for over a week: the first flowering Thelymitra pauciflora (sun orchids):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-4.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 106 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 2671 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171121/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-4-detail.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 4 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 553 x 488, 98 kB
Dimensions of original: 1113 x 983, 178 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 21 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They haven't opened properly yet, and because of the heat I didn't return with proper macro equipment, but hopefully some of the other ones will start soon.


Wednesday, 22 November 2017 Dereel Images for 22 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Remote control woes
Topic: technology, multimedia Link here

When upgrading mplayer I lost the remote control with lirc. Why? Time to investigate the port.

First step was to notice that there's a build option for mplayer:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171122/small/mplayer.png
Image title: mplayer
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 431 x 626, 246 kB
Dimensions of original: 475 x 690, 11 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 22 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171122/small/mplayer-detail.png
Image title: mplayer detail          Dimensions:          1312 x 206, 192 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Wednesday, 22 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Wednesday, 22 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Wednesday, 22 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 
OPTIONS_DEFINE= AALIB AMR_NB AMR_WB ASS BLURAY CACA CDIO DEBUG DV DVDNAV \
ENCA FONTCONFIG FRIBIDI GIF GNUTLS GSM GUI IPV6 JACK \
LADSPA LIBMNG LIRC LZO NAS OPENAL OPENGL \
...

OK, set that, and confirm that it gets set in the options file:

=== root@teevee (/dev/pts/4) /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer-local 2 -> cat /var/db/ports/multimedia_mplayer-local/options
# This file is auto-generated by 'make config'.
# Options for mplayer-1.3.0.20170722_1
_OPTIONS_READ=mplayer-1.3.0.20170722_1
_FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=AALIB AMR_NB AMR_WB ASS BLURAY CACA CDIO DEBUG DV DVDNAV ENCA FONTCONFIG FRIBIDI GIF GNUTLS GSM GUI IPV6 JACK LADSPA LIBMNG LIRC LZO NAS OPENAL OPENGL OPENJPEG OPUS PULSEAUDIO RTC RTCPU RTMP SCHROEDINGER SDL SKINS SMB SNDIO SPEEX SVGALIB V4L VDPAU VPX X11 X11DGA X11VM XINERAMA XVIDEO XVMC
...
OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LADSPA
OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LIBMNG
OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=LIRC
OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LZO

Build mplayer, which really only takes about a minute, and run it. Still no lirc!

OK, next step: so far I've been dealing with the FreeBSD Ports Collection. What does mplayer do in the way of configuration? The output of the /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer-local/work/mplayer-export-2017-07-22/configure script says:

Checking for lirc ... no
Checking for lircc ... no
...
Config files successfully generated by ./configure --cc=cc --host-cc=cc --as=as --mandir=/usr/local/man --extra-cflags=-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include --extra-libs=-L/usr/local/lib --disable-alsa --disable-ass-internal --disable-bitmap-font --disable-crystalhd --disable-esd --disable-faad --disable-ffmpeg_a --disable-ggi --disable-ggiwmh --disable-liba52 --disable-libbs2b --disable-libdirac-lavc --disable-libilbc --disable-libnut --disable-libvorbis --disable-live --disable-joystick --disable-mad --disable-libmpeg2 --disable-nemesi --disable-real --yasm= --disable-aa --disable-libopencore_amrnb --disable-libopencore_amrwb --disable-bluray --disable-caca --disable-libcdio --disable-libdv --disable-enca --disable-gif --disable-libgsm --enable-gui --disable-jack --disable-ladspa --disable-mng --disable-lirc --disable-liblzo --disable-nas --disable-openal --disable-libopenjpeg --disable-libopus --disable-pulse --disable-rtc --enable-runtime-cpudetection --disable-librtmp --disable-libschroedinger-lavc --disable-sdl --disable-smb --disable-sndio --disable-speex --disable-svga --disable-tv-v4l1 --disable-tv-v4l2 --disable-libvpx-lavc --disable-arts --disable-directfb --disable-faac --disable-libdca --disable-toolame --disable-twolame --disable-x264 --disable-xvid --disable-libdirac-lavc --disable-mencoder --disable-mpg123 --disable-musepack --disable-theora --disable-win32dll --disable-qtx !

Why that? Why is there no mention of lirc in the command line? That was supplied by the FreeBSD port, so it should have been there. And why is it checking anyway? Looking at the configure script, I found:

if test "$_lirc" = auto ; then
  _lirc=no
  header_check lirc/lirc_client.h -llirc_client && _lirc=yes
fi

OK, I don't know the details of configure, but it seems fairly obvious that it's looking for a header file lirc/lirc_client.h somewhere, and maybe a library file lirc_client.<mumble>. Does the lirc port install that file (those files)? Looking at /usr/ports/comms/lirc/pkg-plist, I found that it does.

What now? Is it looking in the wrong place? Gave up and let my old faithful ktrace loose on it. That ran for ever: it wrote its trace file across the net, something that it does very slowly, and there were no less than 360 MB of it. And at the end?

Checking for lirc ... yes
Checking for lircc ... no

Why did it find it this time and not the time before? I may never know. All I know is that it now supports lirc.

In passing, why didn't the port pass an --enable-lirc to the configure script? It doesn't seem to be necessary, since configure decides anyway.


Thursday, 23 November 2017 Dereel Images for 23 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Power fail
Topic: general Link here

Power failure at 4:05 this morning, by coincidence while I was awake. I heard the compressor of the deep freeze stop, not for the first time, but every time I wonder if it was because of the thermostat or a power failure. A few seconds later there were beeps from the microwave oven, and the display illumination for the air conditioner went on, so it was pretty clear.

The interesting thing is that it has been 3 months since the last outage. That must be some kind of record.


Firefox: POLA violation
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

firefox “Quantum” has been released. More performance. More security: lots of add-ons that used inappropriate interfaces have now been disabled. That's good for the product, but it also makes it useless for me. To quote the commit message:

r454194 | jbeich | 2017-11-15 06:04:44 +1100 (Wed, 15 Nov 2017) | 9 lines

www/firefox: update to 57.0 (marketed as "Firefox Quantum")

Not a MFH candidate due to POLA violation per redesigned UI, broken
legacy addons and auto-reviewed new addons.

In particular, firemacs and It's All Text! no longer work with Quantum. One step forwards, at least two steps back.


Upgrading lagoon
Topic: technology Link here

Yesterday I received a new display card for Yvonne's machine, lagoon.lemis.com. Today she went shopping, so I had time to do the next step of my hardware upgrades: replace the current machine with another Lenovo ThinkCentre. It should be a piece of cake: it's exactly the same thing as the upgrade of teevee that I performed last week.

Put the card in the new machine, confirmed that it worked. Removed the system disk from old lagoon and put it in the new machine. Boot. Normal problem with the Ethernet card not being recognized (do we really need a different interface name for every kind of interface?), so I had to frob /etc/rc.conf. I pretty much expect this, though I suspect that the standard new machine configuration has a more elegant way of handling the situation.

Next, start X. Fail. OK, that's not surprising. The card in old lagoon proved to be considerably older than the new one, and it needed a different version of the nvidia-driver module. That's what pkg is for. Unload and delete the old one, install the new one:

=== root@lagoon (/dev/pts/0) /eureka/home/grog 24 -> pkg install nvidia-driver-384.59 nvidia-settings-384.59_1 nvidia-xconfig-384.59
The following 5 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):

New packages to be INSTALLED:
        nvidia-driver: 384.59
        nvidia-settings: 384.59_1
        nvidia-xconfig: 384.59
        mesa-libs: 17.1.8
        libunwind: 20170113_1

Number of packages to be installed: 5

The process will require 180 MiB more space.
39 MiB to be downloaded.

Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y
pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/All/nvidia-driver-384.59.txz: Not Found

===>   nvidia-driver-384.90 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc - found
===>   nvidia-driver-384.90 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc - not found
===>   nvidia-driver-384.90 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc - not found
*** Error code 1
Stop.

Huh? What's wrong there? OK, let's try installing the auxiliary ports first:

=== root@lagoon (/dev/pts/0) /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver 32 -> pkg install nvidia-settings-384.59_1 nvidia-xconfig-384.59
...
Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y
[1/4] Fetching nvidia-settings-384.59_1.txz: 100%  735 KiB  83.6kB/s    00:09
pkg: cached package nvidia-settings-384.59_1: size mismatch, fetching from remote
[2/4] Fetching nvidia-settings-384.59_1.txz: 100%  735 KiB 376.1kB/s    00:02
pkg: cached package nvidia-settings-384.59_1: size mismatch, cannot continue

I've seen “size mismatch” messages before where a download had failed, and I was left with a truncated package. But that wasn't the case today. OK, back to the start. Why did the dependency on /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc fail? Clearly it's installed on teevee. Where did it come from?

=== root@teevee (/dev/pts/5) /home/grog 5 -> l /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  186  3 Jul 18:02 /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc
=== root@teevee (/dev/pts/5) /home/grog 6 -> pkg which /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc was installed by package dri3proto-1.0

OK, download that:

=== root@lagoon (/dev/pts/0) /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-settings 47 -> pkg install dri3proto
The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):

New packages to be INSTALLED:
        dri3proto: 1.0

Number of packages to be installed: 1

Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y
[1/1] Fetching dri3proto-1.0.txz: 100%    5 KiB   5.0kB/s    00:01
pkg: cached package dri3proto-1.0: size mismatch, fetching from remote

What is it with these size mismatches? OK, build the port and install it. That worked. Next, try to download the driver. Size mismatch! Build from source. That worked, but...

=== root@lagoon (/dev/pts/0) /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-xconfig 62 -> kldload nvidia
kldload: an error occurred while loading the module. Please check dmesg(8) for more details.

dmesg said:

KLD nvidia.ko: depends on kernel - not available or version mismatch
linker_load_file: Unsupported file type

That's ridiculous! Yes, I know it depends on the kernel, but I just built it with the current kernel! Could it be that something from the old driver was hanging on to something in the kernel. To be sure, I rebooted, but that didn't work either.

Dammit, Yvonne will be home soon. I'm reminded of the xkcd cartoon:

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/success.png

So I removed the nvidia X config and started without a config file. That's slower, but it works. Thank God for that!

Moved the machine to Yvonne's office and brought out the old one:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/Old-lagoon-2.jpeg
Image title: Old lagoon 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 598 x 452, 150 kB
Dimensions of original: 4288 x 3238, 2237 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 23 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What's that disk doing in the bottom? Back to look at the disk I had already removed from the disk cage:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171124/small/Disk.jpeg
Image title: Disk
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 435 x 622, 145 kB
Dimensions of original: 2904 x 4152, 2313 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 24 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's two years old. The other one was dated 3 October this year. And then I discovered that the last upgrade of this machine was only last month, and that I had been doing all this work on the old disk.

I couldn't leave things like that: the data on the disk is out of date, and that would certainly be a problem. So started things all over again!

This time, of course, things weren't quite as bad. But I still needed to change the interface address, install the new nvidia driver—this time without problems—and start X. I still had problems there that I'll need to investigate, but which almost certainly relate to the different xorg.conf file (it proves that the old card supported two monitors, for example). Presumably that will no longer be as much of a problem as what I have been through today.


Computers: end of an era
Topic: technology, history Link here

With the old lagoon, an era goes to end. I've had computers at home for a little over 40 years. I can divide them into roughly 3 periods:

With lagoon, the last of these cases is going out of use, after 20 years. How time flies!


Subtitle mutilation
Topic: multimedia, technology Link here

Yesterday's build of mplayer gave me the remote control again, but while watching TV („Die Rosenheim Cops“, in mild Bavarian dialect), I noticed significant problems with the subtitles. In particular, the German letters ä, ö, ü and ß were frequently dropped, replaced by ? or other characters, but also frequently displayed correctly. And on a couple of occasions they were really badly mutilated. Here three examples:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-2.png
Image title: mplayer 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 696 x 388, 486 kB
Dimensions of original: 1280 x 714, 1069 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 23 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-2-detail.png
Image title: mplayer 2 detail          Dimensions:          1394 x 194, 403 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 23 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

In this case the text was correct up to the first ü. Here's the original text:

         <tt:p xml:id="sub408" region="bottom" begin="00:21:52.000" end="00:21:55.400"
               style="textCenter">
            <tt:span style="textCyan">gerade als die Kundin den Kopf  </tt:span>
            <tt:br/>
            <tt:span style="textCyan">aus dem Fenster gesteckt hat.  </tt:span>
         </tt:p>
         <tt:p xml:id="sub409" region="bottom" begin="00:21:55.400" end="00:21:58.100"
               style="textCenter">
            <tt:span style="textCyan">Das hätte ein Unglück geben können.  </tt:span>
            <tt:br/>
            <tt:span style="textWhite">Ja, hätte.  </tt:span>
         </tt:p>
         <tt:p xml:id="sub410" region="bottom" begin="00:21:58.200" end="00:22:00.200"
               style="textCenter">
            <tt:span style="textWhite">Aber was ist ihr passiert? Nichts.  </tt:span>
         </tt:p>

What happened then? My best guess is that the ü got swallowed, and that the following ö somehow got caused the remainder of the text to be inserted, backwards, where the ü had been. As the markup shows, there's nothing exciting in the subtitle file.

Here's another:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-1.png
Image title: mplayer 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 692 x 390, 439 kB
Dimensions of original: 1277 x 719, 897 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 23 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-1-detail.png
Image title: mplayer 1 detail          Dimensions:          1789 x 151, 369 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 23 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

 

         <tt:p xml:id="sub318" region="bottom" begin="00:17:15.600" end="00:17:18.000"
               style="textCenter">
            <tt:span style="textWhite">Übrigens zusammen mit der Brüstung.  </tt:span>
         </tt:p>

Here it seems that the leading Ü caused the entire line to be reversed.

Here's a third example, mainly because I took the screen shot:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-3.png
Image title: mplayer 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 694 x 389, 507 kB
Dimensions of original: 1276 x 716, 1094 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 23 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171123/small/mplayer-3-detail.png
Image title: mplayer 3 detail          Dimensions:          1310 x 206, 407 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 23 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 23 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

What causes this? It almost looks as if the special characters are being interpreted as control characters. But this is Timed Text Markup Language (TTML), as I discovered, and it includes more information than mplayer will display, in particular colours (they use different colours for different actors).

Could it be a problem with the character encoding? While searching on the web I saw some reference to mplayer using some “Windows”Code page” by default.

There's a -utf8 flag to tell it what it should know (after all, this is XML), and the file starts:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Profile: EBU-TT-D-Basic-DE --><tt:tt xmlns:tts="http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml#styling" xmlns:ebuttm="urn:ebu:tt:metadata"

To be on the safe side, I converted the file to ISO 8859-14 with iconv, but that didn't change anything.

Other display programs? I only had VLC, and it displayed them perfectly, including the colours specified. But so far I haven't found a way to get VLC to respond to a remote control or keyboard, and it's a real pain to have to interact only via a mouse.

So it's looking more and more like an incompatibility between mplayer and TTML. Change the subtitle format? Sure enough, there's a converter, ttml2srt. Tried that:

=== grog@teevee (/dev/pts/4) /spool/Series/Rosenheim-Cops 6 -> python3 ttml2srt.py Der-letzte-Pfusch-20150922-192500.ttml > Der-letzte-Pfusch-20150922-192500.srt
  File "ttml2srt.py", line 7
    <!DOCTYPE html>
    ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

That's in the script, not the input. Sigh. But enough pain for today.


Friday, 24 November 2017 Dereel Images for 24 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Fake Phat Thai
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

I'm still experimenting with various breakfasts, and one that occurred to me was Phat Thai, usually misspelt (clearly by people who can't speak Thai) as “Pad Thai”. A couple of weeks ago I bought various pastes, and today I tried one from Valcom:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Valcom-Phat-Thai-1.jpeg
Image title: Valcom Phat Thai 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 429 x 628, 146 kB
Dimensions of original: 2855 x 4181, 2755 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Valcom-Phat-Thai-2.jpeg
Image title: Valcom Phat Thai 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 430 x 629, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 3063 x 4480, 3423 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I don't really understand Thai food well. Some of it is similar to Malaysian food, which I do understand, and in principle Phat Thai should belong to this category. But in case of doubt, why not follow the recipe?

Here's how I interpreted it:

Don't use this recipe. It's for the record only. The updated recipe will be here.
quantity       ingredient       step
130 g       rice sticks       1
80 g       chicken thigh       2
120 g       Phat Thai paste       3
20 ml       fish sauce       4
10 g       sugar       4
2 g       chili powder       4
80 g       tauge (bean shoots)       5
30 g       spring onions, chopped into 1 cm lengths       5

Preparation

  1. Boil noodles for 6 minutes, then drain and rinse, to be ready just in time for step 4.
  2. Cut the chicken into thin slices and fry in oil.
  3. Add the Phat Thai paste and mix well.
  4. Add noodles and other ingredients, mix well and heat. Serve.

The result looks like this:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171124/small/Phat-thai-1.jpeg
Image title: Phat thai 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 173 kB
Dimensions of original: 4613 x 3456, 2799 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 24 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 

Notes

The recipe specifies 100 g of the paste for an unspecified number of portions. That's a strange proportion (41.67%) of the jar size (240 g). I found that I could easily go to 120 g (half a jar) for a single large portion.

Mixing the paste is almost impossible. It's gelatinous and doesn't soften with heat. The result is lumps that carry over into the finished dish (the darker spots here):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171124/small/Phat-thai-2.jpeg
Image title: Phat thai 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 79 kB
Dimensions of original: 4609 x 3456, 1669 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 24 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I think it should probably be mixed with water and then evaporated.

The instructions on the package of the noodles (“rice stick”) that I chose were to boil for 3-4 minutes, not longer. After 4 minutes they were still very hard; I had to boil for 6½ minutes, after which they were OK.


Hay! It's harvest time!
Topic: general Link here

The hay harvest has been harvested, and Yvonne has just bought some from Fiona Mitchell across the road:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171124/small/Yvonne-2.jpeg
Image title: Yvonne 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 442 x 610, 153 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4768, 3185 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 24 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

There's plenty more where that came from:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Hay.jpeg
Image title: Hay
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 610 x 442, 216 kB
Dimensions of original: 4768 x 3456, 5434 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


Multimedia interface, modern style
Topic: multimedia, technology, opinion Link here

One of the questions I was left with after yesterday's subtitle investigation was whether vlc can be controlled by anything except a mouse. I had discovered, mainly by accident, that it does interpret f to toggle full screen. So I went looking and found this simple explanation of how to Remote Control VLC. TL;DR: enable HTTP interface, select unrecognizable button, set up passwords, reconfigure firewall, download mobile phone app, and after potential troubleshooting you can remote control vlc with your mobile phone. The functionality appears to be limited to what you can do with a mouse, but unlike with a mouse, you need to look at the device to be able to control it.

Further investigation showed that there are also keyboard bindings, called “shortcuts” to confuse the unwary (I thought that was what Microsoft calls symlinks). They're not at all well described, and while going through the list I somehow managed to stop vlc from displaying the subtitles, and nothing I could do would reinstate them. If I can find a way to do it reliably, it might make a good alternative to mplayerif I can find a way to get it to save position when I exit.

By coincidence, while researching these issues, I discovered a reference to mpv, a fork of mplayer that might also be interesting, if I can bear examining it.


Thelymitra: flowered or not?
Topic: gardening Link here

I've only seen two of the dozens of Thelymitra pauciflora (sun orchid) plants trying to flower, and despite the hot weather, there are no more. But last year Emily Noble told me that this flower had already flowered:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20161112/small/Orchid-outing-7-detail.jpeg
Image title: Orchid outing 7 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 394 x 687, 104 kB
Dimensions of original: 1654 x 2884, 488 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 12 November 2016:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

How do you tell? This is what I found today:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171124/small/Thelymitra-pauciflora-1.jpeg
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 601, 144 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4612, 2921 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 24 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


Saturday, 25 November 2017 Dereel Images for 25 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Rainy weather
Topic: general, photography Link here

The long, hot spell has finished, and it has started to rain. Here just before it happened:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Donnerwetter-3.jpeg
Image title: Donnerwetter 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 690 x 391, 108 kB
Dimensions of original: 5467 x 3098, 4972 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Moving away from Dereel
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

I've commented a few months ago about the inaccuracy of web location services. On that occasion some anonymous location service decided I was in or near Traralgon, and there was nothing I could do to change it.

Never mind, things changed on their own. Now I clearly live in Geraldton. While researching recipes (how terrible recipes are on the web!), I was offered pricing at the local Coles supermarket:


https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Web-location.png
Image title: Web location          Dimensions:          871 x 310, 124 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Saturday, 25 November 2017, thumbnails          All images taken on Saturday, 25 November 2017, small
Diary entry for Saturday, 25 November 2017 Complete exposure details

 

That's no longer 300 km away: now it's 12 times the distance, 3,611 km! That's more than the distance from London to Ankara. Where do people get these inaccuracies?


Chicken with 250 g of garlic
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Last week Yvonne found a cookbook that she had picked up in Gilroy 25 years ago. Gilroy claims to be the garlic capital of the world, and every single recipe used copious amounts of garlic. We decided that we'd cook something with garlic for Saturday dinner next week (in other words, today). But what?

Some years earlier, round 1989, while I was still at Tandem Computers, I knew a girl called Louise Helland, who worked in Cupertino, but lived in San Martin, which borders on Gilroy. She invited me for dinner one evening and served “chicken with 40 cloves of garlic”, and I recall that it tasted very good—even her husband liked it.

OK, that sounds appropriate, but how do you do it? Spent a lot of time researching the web (and getting located in Geraldton), and came up with the usual mixture of useless recipes, along with a surprising number of variants. About the only things they had in common were chicken in some form and 40 cloves of garlic (which in my experience can weigh between 0.6 g and 32 g, for a total weight between 24 g and 1.3 kg). Cook the chicken whole, or use chicken pieces? Roast it, fry it, or braise it, possibly in a Dutch oven? Peel the garlic, possibly with ridiculous methods like shaking in a bowl? Or leave it unpeeled? Put it inside the chicken, or outside?

I'm pretty sure that Louise put the cloves inside the whole chicken, unpeeled, and that made sense to me. But I was still concerned that they might not get cooked enough inside. And how much? I decided on about 200 g, and guessed that that would be 3 heads:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-2.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 450, 206 kB
Dimensions of original: 4619 x 3456, 3644 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That proved to be about 240 g, close enough. Unpack the head, cut the ends off the cloves, and tidy up:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-3.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 216 kB
Dimensions of original: 4630 x 3456, 4392 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-4.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 604 x 447, 224 kB
Dimensions of original: 4666 x 3456, 4452 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

By pure coincidence, I ended up with exactly 40 cloves (the first time I counted them), or 41 (the second time). It's pretty meaningless given the range of sizes:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-5.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 450, 216 kB
Dimensions of original: 4620 x 3456, 5170 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I decided to put about three quarters of the garlic in the pan, and the remainder inside the chicken:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-7.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 7
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 611 x 443, 173 kB
Dimensions of original: 4772 x 3456, 3139 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Baked with pumpkin, sweet potato and potato:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-10.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 10
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 611 x 443, 165 kB
Dimensions of original: 4772 x 3456, 2793 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-11.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 11
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 165 kB
Dimensions of original: 4697 x 3456, 3000 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

At the end, the garlic was well cooked, and most of it had shed its skin:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171125/small/Garlic-chicken-14.jpeg
Image title: Garlic chicken 14
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 610 x 442, 169 kB
Dimensions of original: 4769 x 3456, 3387 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 25 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

My caution with the placing of the garlic was well founded. The garlic inside was still pretty pungent, not the way I recall it. The garlic cooked in the pan was cooked through. But the chicken hadn't absorbed much of the garlic flavour, and the addition of garlic really didn't make much difference. Not a recipe to be repeated.


Sunday, 26 November 2017 Dereel Images for 26 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Automatic vacuum cleaner
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

ALDI had a “Robot Vacuum Cleaner” on offer yesterday. We've tried one before and not been impressed—I don't even seem to have mentioned it in my diary—but there's a specific use I have for one, to pick up the dirt that the dogs bring in from outside and deposit in the hallway. So Yvonne bought one, and today I tried it out. It didn't work well. By far the biggest issue is that it doesn't seem to understand carpets:

It also seems to have a very poor understanding of its surroundings. It can't even find its charging station if it's more than about a metre away. Here I've commanded it to return to base (top left at the start of the clip):

I really don't understand how that could happen.

So, should I keep it? It would have to learn a lot more about the layout of the house. But maybe I have the patience to try.


X pain
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

On Thursday I upgraded lagoon, Yvonne's machine—almost. I couldn't get X to work with the nvidia driver. I have to do that when she's not here, so today was the next opportunity. As planned, I copied the configuration from teevee, which has almost identical hardware. And I failed again!

What went wrong? In each case, I ended up with a black display with only a cursor, and a resolution of 640x480. The cursor wouldn't move, and externally started clients didn't display. The same happened when I built a new configuration file using nvidia-xconfig.

OK, that's what log files are for.

[167358.439] (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
[167358.439] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
[167358.439] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
[167358.439] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
[167358.439] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "UseEdidDpi" "FALSE"
[167358.439] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "DPI" "150x150"
[167358.439] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "ModeValidation" "NoMaxPClkCheck"
[167358.439] (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce GT 710 (GK208) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
[167359.117] (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 2097152 kBytes
[167359.117] (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 80.28.b8.00.55
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 8X
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated MetaModes:
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA(0):     "NULL"
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 640 x 480
[167359.117] (**) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (150, 150); computed from "DPI" X config option
[167359.117] (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA: Reserving 6144.00 MB of virtual memory for indirect memory
[167359.117] (II) NVIDIA:     access.
[167359.142] (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "NULL"

By contrast, the excerpt from teevee was:

[    17.721] (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
[    17.721] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
[    17.721] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
[    17.721] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
[    17.722] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "UseEdidDpi" "FALSE"
[    17.722] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "DPI" "150x150"
[    17.722] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "ModeValidation" "NoMaxPClkCheck"
[    17.725] (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration
[    18.505] (--) NVIDIA(0): Valid display device(s) on GPU-0 at PCI:1:0:0
[    18.505] (--) NVIDIA(0):     CRT-0
[    18.505] (--) NVIDIA(0):     DFP-0
[    18.505] (--) NVIDIA(0):     DFP-1 (boot)
[    18.506] (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce GT 710 (GK208) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
[    18.506] (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 2097152 kBytes
[    18.506] (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 80.28.b8.00.45
[    18.507] (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 8X
[    18.508] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): CRT-0: disconnected
[    18.508] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): CRT-0: 400.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[    18.508] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
[    18.509] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: disconnected
[    18.509] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: Internal TMDS
[    18.509] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[    18.509] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
[    18.539] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): connected
[    18.539] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): Internal TMDS
[    18.539] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): 340.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[    18.539] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
[    18.540] (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0): Mode Validation Overrides for SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV
[    18.540] (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0):     (DFP-1):
[    18.540] (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0):     NoMaxPClkCheck
[    18.544] (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "DFP-1:960x540"; removing.
[    18.544] (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "DFP-1:640x360"; removing.
[    18.544] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated MetaModes:
[    18.544] (II) NVIDIA(0):     "DFP-1:1920x1080"
[    18.544] (II) NVIDIA(0):     "DFP-1:1280x720"
[    18.544] (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1920 x 1080
[    18.554] (**) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (150, 150); computed from "DPI" X config option
[    18.554] (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
[    18.555] (II) NVIDIA: Reserving 6144.00 MB of virtual memory for indirect memory
[    18.555] (II) NVIDIA:     access.
[    18.581] (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "DFP-1:1920x1080"

It's difficult to compare like that, though it's clear there's a lot missing in the lagoon log file. Removing the time stamps in the brackets helps. Then I can use diff:

--- Xorg-teevee 2017-11-27 11:37:13.044093000 +1100
+++ Xorg-lagoon 2017-11-27 11:38:21.908626000 +1100
@@ -6,36 +6,15 @@
  (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "DPI" "150x150"
  (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "ModeValidation" "NoMaxPClkCheck"
  (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration
- (--) NVIDIA(0): Valid display device(s) on GPU-0 at PCI:1:0:0
- (--) NVIDIA(0):     CRT-0
- (--) NVIDIA(0):     DFP-0
- (--) NVIDIA(0):     DFP-1 (boot)
  (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce GT 710 (GK208) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
  (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 2097152 kBytes
- (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 80.28.b8.00.45
+ (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 80.28.b8.00.55
  (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 8X
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): CRT-0: disconnected
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): CRT-0: 400.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: disconnected
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: Internal TMDS
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): connected
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): Internal TMDS
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV (DFP-1): 340.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
- (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0):
- (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0): Mode Validation Overrides for SKYDATA S.P.A. BAUHN TV
- (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0):     (DFP-1):
- (**) NVIDIA(GPU-0):     NoMaxPClkCheck
- (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "DFP-1:960x540"; removing.
- (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "DFP-1:640x360"; removing.
  (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated MetaModes:
- (II) NVIDIA(0):     "DFP-1:1920x1080"
- (II) NVIDIA(0):     "DFP-1:1280x720"
- (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1920 x 1080
+ (II) NVIDIA(0):     "NULL"
+ (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 640 x 480
  (**) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (150, 150); computed from "DPI" X config option
  (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
  (II) NVIDIA: Reserving 6144.00 MB of virtual memory for indirect memory
  (II) NVIDIA:     access.
- (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "DFP-1:1920x1080"
+ (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "NULL"

It seems that the driver doesn't recognize the connections to the card. Why not? It almost looks like there's something wrong with it. But it works just fine without the nvidia driver, so it's difficult to think how there could something wrong. I suppose the most conclusive check would be to swap the cards and see what happens.


Firefox pain
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Some discussion on the FreeBSD mailing lists about the status of firefox today. I think that, basically, firefox 57 is broken. Yes, of course, the “breakage” is intentional, and there are good reasons for it, but some plugins aren't extensions, they're basic functionality. Once upon a time everything X had Emacs bindings, but that was too easy, so they broke it. And firefox has also tried to be a (very bad) editor in itself.

I was able to work round this breakage with two addons, firemacs and It's all text. Both work acceptably, but not on the new firefox. I'm sure I'll find many others.

But most people think that the added security (security in a web browser? Hah!) is worth the lack in functionality. Somehow I don't understand the world any more. But then I've been bitching about firefox since I first met it, coincidentally almost exactly 13 years ago. Reading my comments from then, it seems that nothing has changed.

Today, however, I discovered a new port: firefox-esr. It has nothing to do with Eric Raymond: it's an Extended Support Release, and to make things easier it has similar release numbers to base firefox, but not the same. In fact, after reading the FAQ, I'm still not sure what the current version (52.5) corresponds to. It should be release 57, but it still supports my plugins. That will help for a while.

And then there are other browsers, like Pale Moon, currently not in the Ports Collection. I downloaded it for Microsoft, with considerable difficulty (including avoiding gratuitous adware downloads), and how about that, it supports both plugins. But I'm cautious: mainstream browsers are bad enough, but alternatives tend to have even more warts. I suspect that they're mainly itch-scratchers.

As if to prove my point, for some reason the font size on teevee has changed considerably, without me changing the preferences. I can fix that, of course, but why did it happen?


YouTube pain
Topic: multimedia, technology, opinion Link here

I've continually had problems with watching Al Jazeera news. They stream via YouTube, but they keep changing the channel. Today, though, I had problems I haven't seen before. Firstly, I was presented with the most stupid commercial I have seen in a long time, from eBay. Clearly it's an indication of whom they think their customers are. But on other systems that didn't happen. After that, I got a fraction of a second of Al Jazeera, and then an “error message” (“something went wrong. Find out what”, followed by a completely unrelated link).

What caused that? YouTube might have an idea, but they're keeping very quiet. It's reasonable to assume that the problem is related to recent browser updates, but other YouTube videos work fine normally. But reverting to firefox-esr or firefox 56 didn't help. After much searching, found a forum thread that suggested that the “debug info” might help. It might, too, if you have the right documentation. Here's what I got:

{
  "ns": "yt",
  "el": "detailpage",
  "cpn": "v5DJkeDrk79wusmW",
  "docid": "nVHt1_SWTZg",
  "ver": 2,
  "referrer": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVHt1_SWTZg",
  "cmt": "0",
  "plid": "AAVe3AofDMRVIeo0",
  "ei": "tlAaWv3bN4uw4QLmorbQDA",
  "fs": "0",
  "rt": "1487.879",
  "of": "1hvgFyAQtDER5y443IkcFw",
  "euri": "",
  "lact": 2,
  "live": "dvr",
  "cl": "176816739",
  "mos": 0,
  "state": "80",
  "vm": "CAEQARgE",
  "volume": 100,
  "c": "WEB",
  "cver": "2.20171121",
  "cplayer": "UNIPLAYER",
  "cbr": "Chrome",
  "cbrver": "61.0.3163.100",
  "cos": "X11",
  "autoplay": "1",
  "delay": 5,
  "hl": "en_GB",
  "cr": "AU",
  "fexp": "23701648,23701679,23702322,23702700,23703652,23704248,23705256,23705485,23705739,23706129,23708158,23708904,23708906,23708910,23709525,23711500,23713205,23713355,23713711,23713887,23713951,23714024,23715033,9405970,9410705,9422596,9431754,9447917,9449243,9463154,9466592,9466982,9471235,9474467,9474594,9476327,9480475,9484237,9484345,9485000,9488038,9489290",
  "lio": "1511659605.017",
  "vct": "0.000",
  "vd": "NaN",
  "vpl": "",
  "vbu": "",
  "vpa": "true",
  "vsk": "false",
  "ven": "false",
  "vpr": "1",
  "vrs": "0",
  "vns": "0",
  "vec": "null",
  "vvol": "1",
  "debug_error": {
    "errorCode": "fmt.noneavailable",
    "errorDetail": "nosupported.1;a.0;d.1;f18.0;c18.1;f43.0;c43.1;f133.0;f140.0",
    "message": "This video format is not supported.",
    "messageKey": "YTP_HTML5_NO_AVAILABLE_FORMATS_FALLBACK"
  },
  "prerolls": "heartbeat",
  "ismb": 6990000,
  "latency_class": "NORMAL",
  "segduration": 5,
  "relative_loudness": "NaN",
  "user_qual": "auto",
  "debug_videoId": "nVHt1_SWTZg",
  "0sz": false,
  "op": "",
  "yof": false,
  "dis": "",
  "gpu": "GeForce_GT_710/PCIe/SSE2",
  "cgr": true,
  "debug_playbackQuality": "unknown",
  "debug_date": "Sun Nov 26 2017 16:52:06 GMT+1100 (AEDT)"
}

Some of that makes sense. No available HTML5 video formats supported. But what's it looking for? Is that what's encoded on errorDetail? Is it maybe a problem with the plugins? I tried it without, and it failed in the same way—how I hate that eBay commercial! Copied the debug information again. No change whatsoever. There's something wrong there, because it includes a date. Tried it with Chromium. Same problem again, identical debug information saved. So I don't even know which browser produced this output.

On the other hand, it works fine on eureka. So I'm left with:

Ultimately, I suppose this is a YouTube issue, and it might go away. But they don't make it easy to follow up.


Video player pain
Topic: multimedia, technology Link here

So I got round to trying mpv, a fork of mplayer. And how about that, it displays the subtitles correctly. Or it did. Somehow, while playing around with the subtitle file, I managed to break it. There's nothing obvious, but mpv, mplayer and vlc now all refuse to have anything to do with it. Why? Who knows? They're all video players, so they all don't believe in no steenking error messages. Emacs still reports valid XML, and I can't see anything wrong with it. The character encoding is correct. I suspect permissions or modification timestamps, but no, that all works too. What a pain these programs are!

Also checked how easy it would be to use mpv to replace mplayer. One of the big pains has been support for lirc. And sure enough, mpv has no support at all for lirc:

Support for LIRC has been removed in mpv 0.9.0. The new way to use such devices is through evdev. This means the devices will emit normal X11 key events. You should be seeing these key press events if you start xev (make sure xev is focused). This might require additional configuration with ir-keytable.

evdev? Ah, evdev. Another Linux thing. In this case, it seems to make sense—I have always wondered what madness prevailed on the authors of lirc to create such a bizarre interface—but it looks like I'll have to open another can of worms before I am done.


Flat lizard
Topic: animals Link here

Yvonne returned from visiting the Giddins to tell me she didn't want to drive into the garage: there was a dead lizard there. Yes, indeed, very dead: it had lost its entire innards through its mouth, quite a sad thing to see. The skin wasn't damaged, and my best bet is that it was just behind a wheel when Yvonne drove out. It managed to drag itself about a metre before finally dying. For once I don't feel like posting the other photos:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171126/small/Dead-lizard-4.jpeg
Image title: Dead lizard 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 159 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 4406 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 26 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

 


Monday, 27 November 2017 Dereel Images for 27 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

That which we call a rose
Topic: gardening Link here

What's a rose? On our daily dog walk, there's a plant growing wild on the roadside:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171127/small/Wild-rose.jpeg
Image title: Wild rose
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 166 kB
Dimensions of original: 4609 x 3456, 2526 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 27 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It looks somewhat like a rose. The leaves are similar, and it has numerous thorns, none of which I managed to get in focus. Looking at comparison images, it could be a Rosa canina (dog rose). Here the current photo from Wikipedia:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Divlja_ruza_cvijet_270508.jpg

How did it get there? It's not the kind of plant that people normally plant, and it doesn't appear to grow naturally in Australia.


Content-free email
Topic: technology, general Link here

Email from ALDI Mobile today.

Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:31:17 +1100
From: noreply@aldimobile.com.au
To: groggyhimself@lemis.com
Subject: AldiMobile - Expiry Warning

HTML only content. Pointed it at my browser and waited. It displayed a logo and nothing else. OK, what does the HTML markup say?

<html><body><img alt="ALDImobile header" src="https://unite.aldimobile.com.au/images/540/Email_header_image.png"><p></p></body></html>

Isn't it amazing how broken email can still be, after over 40 years?


Al Jazeera breakage: YouTube, not me
Topic: multimedia, technology Link here

The Al Jazeera Live Stream on YouTube is still broken, though eBay has replaced their moronic commercial with a marginally less stupid one.

OK, I use FreeBSD and firefox, the latter of which is currently suspect. But Real Users use Microsoft. What happens there? Exactly the same thing as on teevee. In fact, the only system that will currently display it is eureka, running old versions of FreeBSD and firefox. Friends on IRC confirmed: for some it works, for others it crashes after the morons.

Why isn't YouTube doing something about it? At the very least a warning with “Some people have a problem displaying opening this stream. We're working on it”?


Communicating with Skype
Topic: technology, general, animals, opinion Link here

The IHAA is having its Annual General Meeting tomorrow—at our house! The 50 odd members are spread around Australia, so it's impractical to meet face to face. Amy Heldane is president, but she's in Yambuk, in the middle of nowhere. Chris Bahlo is vice president, and Nele Koemle is treasurer. Both of them will be in Dereel tomorrow, and they've co-opted Yvonne to be returning officer, so it makes sense to do it here.

And the rest? Skype conference. I've used it in the past, during my MySQL days, and I still have the important people of those days in my contact list. But presumably tomorrow it will be a video conference. How does that work?

First, I need a video camera. OK, euroa, my Microsoft laptop has that, and since it's running Microsoft, I can hope for some reasonable level of support. Called up Chris Bahlo and sort of got it to work. But how do you do a video conference? Messing around took long enough that we hung up while I tried to get my act together. Managed to get Callum Gibson to join in, and then I called Chris again. Later Matti (Juha) Kupiainen joined in. Each step seemed fraught with difficulties. Try calling something at the thing makes noises and displays artefacts reminiscent of a kiddie's science fiction film. When you're connected, the person you're connected to shows up as a small icon. To get them to display at any reasonable size, you need to do a bit of tree-climbing with the mouse.

Which menus? I still don't know. What I do know is that each of us had a different interface. Callum was using Microsoft “Windows” 10, I was using Microsoft “Windows” 7, and Chris was using some version of Android. Callum sent me this image of what he saw to explain what to click (tastefully waiting until I turned my chair in the other direction):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171127/small/Skype-view.png
Image title: Skype view
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 398 kB
Dimensions of original: 2049 x 1538, 2161 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 27 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

This also showed that I was displaying my entire screen (“desktop”), not just myself—that's my task bar almost at the bottom of the image. He had circled this menu item (at top right):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171127/small/Skype-view-detail.png
Image title: Skype view detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 685 x 394, 113 kB
Dimensions of original: 330 x 190, 18 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 27 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Problem: I didn't have anything like that, and despite searching, I couldn't find it.

When Matti came online, he called me. How do I answer the call? I don't know, but it seemed to involve suspending the conference call, and by the time I had worked that out, he was no longer available (Hung up? Skype timed out? Who knows?). So both Callum and I tried to invite him to the conference. Callum gave up after he was told that, for some reason, this could cost money. Finally we got him on line—it seems that it was my invitation that ultimately worked, though it was so confusing that even after the call, Matti thought that it had been Callum.

Then there are other random things. For some reason, my image was laterally inverted, though at some point Callum managed to turn it the right way round. I wonder if he knows how he did it.

Clearly a case for RTFM. But where? I was unable to find instructions. Is my version of Skype out of date? Who knows? How do I find out? Even by Microsoft standards, Skype stands out as a particularly strange and badly documented protocol. Maybe we should try something else, like Google Hangouts. That won't help us for tomorrow, of course, and I can see that we will have some issues, especially as most of the members are non-technical.


Tuesday, 28 November 2017 Dereel → Napoleons → Dereel Images for 28 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

35 years together!
Topic: history, opinion Link here

35 years ago today I swapped wives over a weekend: Doris moved out, and Yvonne moved in. Time flies when you're having fun, and it's sobering to consider that we have more years behind us than ahead of us.


Craig Weber/Klearview: partial refund
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

One of my nastiest experiences in recent times was my attempt to buy a disk on eBay from a seller called klearview or klearview_au, run by a certain Craig Weber. He first claimed that I had not paid, causing me to accidentally pay twice. Then he didn't deliver. eBay didn't want to know because it was a bank transfer, and to rub salt into the wound they removed my negative feedback with no explanation, although I demanded one, something that I find criminal on the part of eBay. At some time I received a refund, quite possibly from eBay, but only for one payment. I braved the amazingly broken police web sites to finally watch my complaint be dismissed as trivial—only a little over $100!

So I should take this to a civil court. Somehow I couldn't get round to it. Then today I received something unexpected:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Weber-cheque-2.jpeg
Image title: Weber cheque 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 698 x 387, 76 kB
Dimensions of original: 4186 x 2318, 1212 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

A partial refund! I paid $104.99, but he only refunded $103.99. Why? My best guess is that somebody, possibly the police, leaned on him to do something, so he paid enough that I could no longer press any charges. I can see him raising his middle finger at me.

There's so much wrong with this matter at so many levels. eBay is probably in violation of Australian law by removing my feedback, something that they deny, but the feedback is no longer there. The web reporting system (ACORN, the Australian Cybercrime Reporting Network) is so inaccurate that you almost can't use it: I was given contact details that nobody could understand. There's no other way to contact the police department in charge of these matters. And when it finally gets down to real policemen, they have instructions not to address matters of this nature. So scum of the earth like Craig Weber <craigweber@optusnet.com.au> can slip through the loopholes, just like he did today with the $1 that he didn't refund. In many ways, he's the least of the problems: there will always be dregs like him, but society and the authorities do nothing to curb his activities.


Feelworld Field Monitor
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

The “field monitor” that I ordered two weeks ago has arrived, so in to Napoleons to pick it up. What's it like? On the whole, very good, but with some unnecessary issues. To my surprise, the base package comes with no power supply whatsoever, something very stupid. I had already discovered that it can be run by battery or mains power, and that it comes without a battery or charger, so I bought a kit which included those components. But no mains power supply? That's tacky.

The battery and charger have their issues too. There appears to be no way to clip the battery into the charger, and I needed to wedge it in with a bit of plastic. Also, it seems that when the battery is in place in the monitor, the power LED lights whether it's on or not. So when not using it, you need to remove the battery. All silly little details that detract unnecessarily from the overall impression.

And on the camera? It displays photos well. And that's all. After reading through the manuals for all the cameras I have, I discover:

You cannot shoot pictures or movies when the HDMI cable is connected.

What? That's the whole purpose of the exercise. Why buys a toy just to look at photos you've already taken? That's what computers are for.

There are, however, suggestions that things aren't that clear-cut. Further down I read:

Using the TV remote control

The camera can be operated by a TV remote control when connected to a TV that supports HDMI control.

You can operate the camera by following the operation guide displayed on the TV.

The instruction manual for the E-PM2 goes on to state that you need to enable a button in the menu. It seems that this applies to the E-M1 Mark II as well, but they don't mention the fact, presumably because after all this time they've got used to the fact.

In addition, Olympus' web site shows exactly what I'm looking for. It refers to video, but is it really only limited to that? One way or another, it's a complete contradiction of the instruction manual.

So: not quite the joy I was expecting. But does the monitor itself work well? Yes. I took off an HDMI cable from eureka and connected it, getting the smallest 1920×1080 display I have ever seen:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-3.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 138 kB
Dimensions of original: 5282 x 3888, 3834 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-2.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 134 kB
Dimensions of original: 5286 x 3888, 3610 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-1.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 142 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4519 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Modulo Moiré, its even readable:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-4.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 168 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 10231 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And focus peaking “works”, showing that my xterm is perfectly sharp:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-5.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 196 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 10305 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

So does the histogram (bottom right):

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-6.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 166 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 10301 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And the false colours give you, well, false colours:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Monitor-7.jpeg
Image title: Monitor 7
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 195 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 9637 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I still haven't worked out what good they are, and I didn't find the zebra striping while working my way through the menus. But if I can get the camera to display on the monitor, all will be well.

If not, I may have to fall back to using the AV output: after all, that worked without a problem on the Olympus E-30 years ago. But I couldn't find the cable, and in any case, the monitor has a 3.5 mm phone connector input. OK, I have a somewhat similar cable, so I tried it:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Accident.jpeg
Image title: Accident
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 611 x 442, 98 kB
Dimensions of original: 4779 x 3456, 2197 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's what happened: it took that photo. The camera (Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II) just happened to be in the way. I had forgotten that the cable is for the remote control. So I'd need a new cable with different wiring to get any video out of the thing.


Radiation tower progress
Topic: general Link here

So now we have two radiation towers:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Radiation-towers-2.jpeg
Image title: Radiation towers 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 135 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4858 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Radiation-towers-1.jpeg
Image title: Radiation towers 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 144 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4884 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The second (Telstra, and smaller, on the left) has apparently been physically complete for some time. You'd think that would have been the biggest issue, but it's still not active.


Misery Creek again
Topic: gardening Link here

On my way back from Napoleons I went down Misery Creek Road again. Things have changed, and there's not much to see apart from these flowers, which at a distance looked like a Goodenia species:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Wildflower-1-0.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 1 0
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 449, 272 kB
Dimensions of original: 4638 x 3456, 8532 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/Wildflower-1-1.jpeg
Image title: Wildflower 1 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 137 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4609, 2638 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Timely message from eBay
Topic: technology, general, opinion Link here

Received this morning:

From bounces+1434781-7b60-brokenebay=lemis.com@m.reply.ebay.com.au  Mon Nov 27 16:30:05 2017
From: eBay <eBay@reply.ebay.com.au>
To: dereelyauctions <ebaybreakage@lemis.com>
Subject: Hip hip hoorah, Greg???you never know what you'll get on Cyber Monday!

This is one of these silly messages they continually send to an auction address I registered a while back when they couldn't work out how to let me sell in Australia. The content matches the emetic commercials that they publish on YouTube. But look at the date! Cyber Monday was all but over when they sent it! Yes, clearly they're behind the times on apps, and would I like to secure them. Yes, of course. So it did it. What? Why should it tell me? That would be insecure.

A few seconds, then it dawned on me: Gmail. And sure enough:

=== grog@eureka (/dev/pts/15) ~ 55 -> fetchmail
fetchmail: Authorization failure on groogled@gmail.com@gmail-pop.l.google.com
fetchmail: For help, see http://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-FAQ.html#R15
fetchmail: Query status=3 (AUTHFAIL)

Aargh! How do I fix that? It didn't say—after all, it had just done me a favour, and there's no reason to be less secure. Fortunately, I keep a diary, and I've been there before. The instructions are still valid, and at the end of it I finally found a page with details of how to do it next time.


AGM with Skype: the pain
Topic: technology, animals, opinion Link here

Nele Koemle along this afternoon with Ellie, a laptop and copious quantities of paper for the AGM of the Islandic Horse Association of Australia. Chris Bahlo was there too, of course. And that was all. The rest was done by Skype.

Things didn't go well. Nele had problems getting her laptop on the network, something that should happen automatically. But her machine (Microsoft “Windows” 10) connected and said something about limited access. What does that mean? They started network debugging the way that I would never have done, and rather than have an argument, I left them to it.

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/AGM-4.jpeg
Image title: AGM 4
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 607 x 444, 160 kB
Dimensions of original: 5311 x 3888, 3291 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

After a reboot and I don't know what else, the meeting started only a little late. I tried to join in on euroa, but Skype managed to foil me. Look for “Icelandic Horse Association of Australia”? No luck. Fortunately we had been given a code which resolved to the association, but I couldn't join the call—exactly the same issue as we had yesterday. I still don't know how to join a conference call, nor even if it is possible for somebody to call up. We had this sort of stuff down to a fine art at IBM decades ago: call in, give a code, and you're in the meeting. Why can't Skype do that? Why, can't Skype do that? Maybe it can, but without documentation it's a dead loss.

So we used only Nele's laptop, which displayed screens in a particularly suboptimal way:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171128/small/AGM-8.jpeg
Image title: AGM 8
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 139 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 6135 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 28 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That image at the right of the screen isn't anybody at all; it's a static image. Most people are in the small band across the bottom, and I had absolutely no idea who most of the people were.

The meeting itself was chaotic, possibly because of everybody's experience, but clearly more discipline is required. Various people sounded off about issues that weren't on the agenda, some moaning about how horrible an experience it had been being a member, and goodbye, how horrible an experience it had been being a member, and goodbye, how horrible an experience it had been being a member, and goodbye, until finally they were done. About the only reasonably professional part of the meeting was Nele's Treasurer's report. If there was a secretary's report, I missed it.

The important part of the meeting was the election of new officers, and both Nele and Chris were standing (for Treasurer and Ordinary member respectively). We four were also the only people allowed to cast votes, since they had to be physical slips of paper. Chris and Nele—especially Nele—had come with multiple proxy declarations, and they had to be transferred to paper. Yvonne was supposed to be Returning officer (a term that nobody seemed to know), but asked me to do it. So Nele spent lots of time writing slips like this one:

 
https://lemis.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/grog/Photos/20171129/small/Ballot.jpeg
Image title: Ballot
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 748 x 361, 77 kB
Dimensions of original: 4952 x 2387, 1658 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 29 November 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Finally we were done. The new president is Amy Heldane (29 votes against 10 for Laura Hall-Smith). Vice president is Renska Younger, the only candidate. Secretary is (again) Estelle Hobbins with 28 votes against 10 for Lou Hilton. Who didn't vote? I think it must have been I. Nele was returned unopposed as treasurer. Ordinary members (referred to as general committee members) are Michelle Glorie (33 votes), Chris Bahlo (25) and Thea Royal (23). Birgit Kossmann got 14 votes, Monika O'Reilly 11, and Lou Hilton 1. Lou was upset about that, but looking at the list of candidates, she wasn't even on the list.

And the path ahead? One of the motions that passed was to make it easier to vote. I will be happy not to have to participate in a meeting under these conditions again.


Wednesday, 29 November 2017 Dereel Images for 29 November 2017
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Cornering YouTube breakage
Topic: multimedia, technology, opinion Link here

We've been discussing the breakage of YouTube's live stream of Al Jazeera News for a while. Some people think it might be a codec issue—and indeed it might be—but there are also considerations of video drivers. That would fit the problems with teevee, since I've just upgraded the video drivers.

Then there was another loose end: Pale Moon, which is in the Ports Collection after all. It claims to support all the old addons that firefox no longer wants to know about. Installed it and got a particularly old-fashioned looking interface, and font sizes approximately twice the size of those of firefox. It didn't offer an opportunity to read in my firefox preferences, so I had to do it manually.

Firstly: the addons install, but don't work—at least that's the case for firemacs. And Al Jazeera? Works. So now we have:

System       OS       Browser       Status
dischord       Microsoft 7       firefox 57       doesn't work
dischord       Microsoft 7       chrome 62       works
dischord       Microsoft 7       Microsoft “Internet Explorer” 11       doesn't work
eureka       FreeBSD       chromium 52       works
eureka       FreeBSD       firefox 49       works
euroa       Microsoft 7       firefox 58       works
euroa       Microsoft 7       chrome 62       works
euroa       Microsoft 7       Microsoft “Internet Explorer” 11       doesn't work
teevee       FreeBSD       chromium 52       doesn't work
teevee       FreeBSD       firefox ESR 52       doesn't work
teevee       FreeBSD       firefox 57       doesn't work
teevee       FreeBSD       palemoon       works

So clearly it's not a FreeBSD issue, it's not a video driver issue. It may be a browser issue, but how can you tell without proper diagnostics? And how do you report these things to the sensible people who must be behind the dumbed-down interface that is what I see of YouTube?


Understanding focus stacking
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

I've been thinking for some time about how Olympus' focus stacking works. In principle it's simple: the camera takes multiple photos with the almost the same settings, only changing the focus distance between each image.

But by how much? How many photos do I need to be able to assemble a final image? This page by Richard Turton gives a lot of insight. But I've read it twice now, and it doesn't really present things the way I want, and it's difficult to convert. In particular, I want to know how to set the “focus differential” and “number of shots” parameters in the camera menu. Apart from that, I've already established that, although Richard used the same equipment as I (Olympus OM-D E-M1 and M.Zuiko Digital ED 60 mm f/2.8 Macro, some of the Exif data he recorded was different from mine.

What information do I need? Understanding how the focus works must be key to understanding the other parameters. At this point it's worthwhile restating the Thin Lens Formula:

1 / u + 1 / v = 1 / f

That's the way I learnt it. f is the focal length, u is the distance from the subject to the lens, and v is the distance from the lens to the sensor. Clearly u and v are symmetrical, and many people nowadays write S₀ and S₁ instead of u and v, but I find that the explicit variable names add semantics that aren't in the subscripted variables.

The lenses report at least three parameters. Here an example from the 60 mm macro:

Focus Step Count                : 8421
Focus Step Infinity             : 5392
Focus Step Near                 : 18597
Focus Distance                  : 0.295 m

And here are values from the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 mm f/4.0 IS PRO:

Focus Step Count                : 9300
Focus Step Infinity             : 4931
Focus Step Near                 : 21310
Focus Distance                  : 1.565 m

There's also the additional information “Focus Distance”. This isn't directly related to the focus steps: it's related to u, while the focus steps are related to v. More to the point, though, they're only recorded to the nearest 5 mm, which makes them pretty much useless for my purposes.

From observation, “Focus Step Infinity” and “Focus Step Near” are the limit values of the focus step, so the 60 mm lens has 18597 - 5392 = 13,205 steps. The 12-100 has 21310 - 4931 = 16,379 steps. Both of these are amazingly fine. The 60 mm lens can focus to 1:1 magnification (u = v, so each is 2f), which in a thin lens corresponds to a 60 mm extension. I'm not sure what magic is in the 60 mm lens—it doesn't change length at all when focusing, quite an achievement for a macro lens—but this would mean that a focus step corresponds to a change of position of about 4.5 μm (0.0045 mm).

But is the focus step linear? I have no evidence either way, but the more I think about it, the more I think it must be. Firstly, it would be far more complicated to build a lens to do it any other way, and it's not only not necessary, but not appropriate: the point of focusing is to ensure that the image of the subject is in focus to within a certain tolerance, the circle of confusion. And that's proportional to the distance from true focus. Here an image from the Wikipedia page:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Circle_of_confusion_calculation_diagram.svg/400px-Circle_of_confusion_calculation_diagram.svg.png

The variables marked here are confusing. S₁ and f are as discussed; S₂ is explained in the discussion, but basically another subject distance, and F₁ is the v corresponding to S₁. But it shows that the diameter of the circle of confusion (C on the right, indicated by the red lines) is proportional to the distance from the lens.

So: let's collect Exif data. I can't do that without collecting photos as well, of course, though their content is irrelevant. So I set the camera to the lowest possible resolution, 1280×960 pixel low quality JPEG and took a number of sequences, starting at the closest distance that the lens could set, and going for 999 images, or until the focus reached infinity and the camera stopped by itself. Here are some details of the sequences:

Focal       focus       aperture       count       start       end
length       differential                   focus       focus
60       1       2.8       999       0.185       0.450
60       1       5.6       602       0.185       0.820       904
60       4       2.8       302       0.185       0.810
60       4       5.6       152       0.185       0.810
30       1       5.6       543       0.095      
30       8       5.6       71       0.095      
12       1       5.6       93       0.150      
100       1       5.6       350       0.450      

The sequences took a surprising amount of time. The camera takes 1/60 s to process an image with the electronic shutter, and the shutter speed was set to 1/250 s, so it shouldn't have influenced the speed, but in fact I only got about 11 shots a second initially. For 999 shots that's 1½ minutes. But the results, here for the first sequence, show that it took nearly 2½ minutes:

File 4B290749.JPG
Date taken:     Wednesday, 29 November 2017, 17:53:39
Focus:          MF 0.185 m (0.185 - 0.185 m)
      ...
File 4B291747.JPG
Date taken:     Wednesday, 29 November 2017, 17:55:30
Focus:          MF 0.45 m (0.448 - 0.452 m)

The first result also shows that I was wrong to claim that 999 shots is a ridiculously large number: in fact, it's too small in some cases. But why did the others stop before reaching infinity and before reaching the specified number of shots (999)? My guess is that this was because the focus limit switch on the lens was set to “0.19-0.4 m”. To quote from Olympus' excuse for documentation:

Focus limit switch (A)
Sets the shooting range.
Turn the switch to set the reproduction ratio scale to the default setting. (B)
If the switch is turned to [1:1], the point of focus is set to 0.19 m. Use MF to shoot at a fixed point of focus. The switch is returned to [0.19-0.4 m].

That would also explain why it only happened with the 60 mm lens.

Yes, the focus stopped at 0.45 m or 0.81 m, not 0.4 m, but what do they know? The documentation even gives the nearest focus point incorrectly. And of course this limit to focus stacking isn't documented anywhere. This also agrees with the fact that the issue only occurred with the 60 mm lens.

And where is the length measured from? Traditionally (as in the lens formula above) it's from the middle of the lens. But for a 60 mm lens at 1:1 magnification, the subject distance is 120 mm, not 185. I'm guessing that it's measuring from the front edge of the lens, or maybe the front element. Another thing to check. One way or another, it's clear that the distances are useless. Here it goes backwards:

File 4B292851.JPG
Date taken:     Wednesday, 29 November 2017, 18:07:21
Exposure:       1/250 sec, f/5.6 (EV 12.9), 24/200 ISO
Focal length:   30.0 mm (full frame equivalent: 60 mm)
Focus:          MF 0.105 m (0.104 - 0.106 m)
File 4B292852.JPG
Date taken:     Wednesday, 29 November 2017, 18:07:21
Exposure:       1/250 sec, f/5.6 (EV 12.9), 24/200 ISO
Focal length:   30.0 mm (full frame equivalent: 60 mm)
Focus:          MF 0.095 m (0.094 - 0.096 m)

This may be due to the lens. I'll know more when I look at the values for focus step count.

Another thing that I notice is that even with focus differentials of more than 1, the number of shots appears to be far more than the depth of field would indicate. It's difficult to be sure without more careful checking, but in the series above, where exiftool suggests a depth of field of round 2 mm, and with the focus differential set to 8, it took 40 shots for the reported focus distances to increase from 0.095 m to 0.12 m. That would imply a depth of field round 0.6 mm. But first I need to see whether something isn't lying.

In passing, it occurs to me that the canonical depth of field formula is wrong. It bases on the aperture as an F number (f/2.8 for example. But looking at extreme macro focus, it's clear that this relationship is not important: the size of the circle of confusion depends on v and the aperture, not f. At 1:1 magnification, f/2.8 is v/5.6, so the depth of field is actually larger than the formula would represent.

So, what do I need to do now?

  1. Find a relation between focus step counts and limits, and a way to convert them to subject distance (v), or possibly a distance from the front of the lens, which is just a linear offset from v.
  2. Relate the focus differential to the size of the circle of confusion.
  3. Find the information about the focus differential in the Exif data. This is nice to have, not must have: I can write it down if I can't find it.
  4. Fix my depth of field program to represent the aperture in terms of v, not f.
  5. Find correlations for different focus differentials and different cameras. Richard Turton's values for the 60 mm lens are quite different from mine.

That should keep me busy.


Thursday, 30 November 2017 Dereel Images for 30 November 2017
Top of page
previous day

Counting the photos
Topic: photography Link here

I took a total of 3,124 photos yesterday, almost certainly a record. It didn't reflect in battery or storage usage. At the end, the battery charge indicator had dropped from 82% to 78%, and the memory card, not empty to start with, had:

Total files listed:
      3322 files       4 589 276 215 bytes
                     26 731 151 360 bytes free

That was easy to understand: I had deliberately taken the lowest-quality images I could (1280×960 JPEG, about 450 kB each) since I'm never going to use them. After I was done, I set the camera back to raw mode, and received the message “Card full”.

Idiot! There were over 26 GB free, enough for about 1,400 images. Clearly it was basing its count on the number already stored. OK, back up and “format” the card. “Card full”.

Something left behind after format? Put the card in the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark I, where it was recognized happily. Put the E-M1 card in the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. “Card full”.

Panic time? Total reset (which is almost as bad)? First I reset the other parameters, including focus stacking. And it was happy.

After further analysis, it's fairly clear that:


Vultures in Frankfurt?
Topic: technology Link here

For various reasons I need a web presence in Germany. A proxy would do it, if I could find everything I need like that. But then Jamie Fraser came up with Vultr, a provider of really cheap virtual machines. I already use one with RootBSD, and I'm happy with them. But they're not in Germany, and I pay $35 a month. Vultr offers VMs (with FreeBSD) for as little as $2.50 per month, though they would charge more than RootBSD for the configuration that I have there.

OK, take a look. Before anything happens, they want my credit card number. After recent experiences, I preferred PayPal, where I had to pay $10 up front. Then the offers changed. No $2.50 VMs any more (“sold out”, apparently for all their locations). The cheapest available are $5 a month, still quite acceptable, especially considering they offer 1 GB of data. More important, though, they have no VMs of any kind in Frankfurt am Main. I would have been much happier if they had told me that before taking my money.

OK, they expect to have VMs available in 2 weeks. I can wait that long. But they've started off the relationship on a negative note.


Do you have a comment about something I have written? This is a diary, not a “blog”, and there is deliberately no provision for directly adding comments. It's also not a vehicle for third-party content. But I welcome feedback and try to reply to all messages I receive. See the diary overview for more details. If you do send me a message relating to something I have written, please indicate whether you'd prefer me not to mention your name. Otherwise I'll assume that it's OK to do so.


Top of page Previous month Greg's home page Today's diary entry Next month Greg's photos Copyright information

Valid XHTML 1.0!

$Id: diary-nov2017.php,v 1.47 2022/11/15 05:24:37 grog Exp $