|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 12 May 2026 | Dereel | Images for 12 May 2026 |
| Top of page | ||
| next day | ||
| last day |
|
Advertisement overload
|
Topic: technology, health, opinion | Link here |
Checking on the news this morning on albo.lemis.com, my mobile phone, I saw an advertisement telling me to ditch my relatively accurate blood pressure monitor and use a mobile phone app.
OK, I'll bite. How does that work? It even wants to measure blood sugar (but only in unaccustomed mg/dl) and BMI. Installed it, but I couldn't get it to work. Instead it was so full of advertisements that I couldn't find out what it was supposed to do, nor whether it could do it. Somehow these apps are getting so advertisement-oriented that they're completely useless. By the time I gave up, I had accidentally installed 5 different apps, all of which were overloaded with advertisements. One claimed, without reading, that my blood pressure was 119/79, and my pulse was 69. Is that just guesswork?
About the only thing of interest was one that claimed to read my blood pressure via the camera. Place your finger on the “camera”. Wait. Which camera? It turned on the light, which I thought was what I needed, but no, it was one of the other lenses. And at the end it came up with the decision that my pulse was 83/min.
And the blood pressure? Another dozen advertisements. And then, without any measurement, it decided that it was 100/75, and my pulse was 70. Was that the same app? By comparison, I measured 118/65 and a pulse of 87 (!) with a real blood pressure monitor.
So what's the point of these things? They're so inaccurate and hard to use that their suggestion of ditching the correct equipment is just plain stupid.
|
More bde fun
|
Topic: technology, multimedia, opinion | Link here |
Still more work on bde.lemis.com today. Yesterday I had established that the keyboard mapping still wasn't correct. Off to compare what I had done. The problem I had was that the key at bottom left (marked “ctrl” should be Meta. OK, check the keymap file (/home/local/X/keyboard/default-map). xev tells me that the key has the code 37:
KeyPress event, serial 33, synthetic NO, window 0xc00001,
root 0x3ec, subw 0x0, time 93545014, (77,123), root:(726,147),
state 0x0, keycode 37 (keysym 0xffe3, Control_L), same_screen YES,
And what's in /home/local/X/keyboard/default-map?
keycode 37 = Control_L NoSymbol Control_L
OK, fix that then. But while checking, the key generated Meta_L. Where did that come from? What am I missing?
What I did manage was to set up Nextcloud so that video and loudspeaker worked, the latter very quietly. It's too polite to test the microphone, which has multiple ways of describing itself. In the system probes I have
May 11 14:57:36 bde kernel: uaudio0: <C-Media Electronics Inc. USB PnP Sound Device, class 0/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 1> on usbus0
But that's not what the web browser wants. For some reason, despite my telling it to save the information, it kept coming back with microphone 1, the one that didn't work. And for reasons I really don't understand, it always comes up in laterally inverted mode. Why? I can correct it, but why should I? It seems to be some kind of brain damage in this area: Zoom does it too. But finally I was able to get something like a test done:
Unfortunately, it's too polite to test my microphone. Fired up Zoom and confirmed that yes, it works. But while looking at that, looked at the memory usage:
last pid: 40873; load averages: 5.69, 2.75, 1.38; battery: 99% up 0+05:04:15 15:57:58
69 processes: 2 running, 67 sleeping
CPU: 95.0% user, 0.0% nice, 2.1% system, 1.0% interrupt, 1.9% idle
Mem: 2224M Active, 2187M Inact, 199M Laundry, 944M Wired, 596M Buf, 2227M Free
Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
40577 grog 98 1 0 4197M 1237M CPU1 1 12:57 217.35% firefox
That looks normal enough. But while watching it, I saw
last pid: 40894; load averages: 6.30, 5.39, 3.30; battery: 99% up 0+05:11:27 16:05:10
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
40577 grog 94 3 0 13G 1633M select 3 31:22 254.01% firefox
That's a big increase for an idle system. Is Zoom to blame? Kill it (the tab):
last pid: 40895; load averages: 6.04, 5.40, 3.37; battery: 99% up 0+05:11:52 16:05:35
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
40577 grog 85 3 0 6050M 2735M select 2 32:35 334.97% firefox
last pid: 40895; load averages: 4.86, 5.21, 3.38; battery: 99% up 0+05:12:25 16:06:08
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
40577 grog 83 0 0 8353M 4737M select 3 34:05 27.29% firefox
The resident memory increased by a factor of nearly 4! Was that the reason for running out of memory yesterday?
|
Homemade chips: last gasp
|
Topic: food and drink, opinion | Link here |
I've been quite disappointed in the results of making chips myself rather than buying pre-prepared frozen chips. A year ago I bought a chip cutter:
|
|
|||||||||
As the image shows, it's flimsy. I had great difficulties cutting the chips: the potatoes seemed to be firmer than the cutter. And the results were less than encouraging. I had gradually come to the conclusion that the thing was a waste of time and money.
But before finally discarding it, it occurred to me: these things cut two different thicknesses. The one I had been using was the finer of the two, roughly 8.5 mm square (64 chips max per cut). But there's a second cutter, offering roughly 11 mm mainly square (36 chips, some rectangular cross section). Try that?
The good news: the potato cut with no trouble at all. And the results didn't look that bad:
|
|
|||||||||
But they were still so dark that I pulled them out of the fat 1 minute before they were due. And they weren't completely cooked. Clearly both the deep fryer and the chip cutter really wanted me to use this size.
But why? I don't like the look of the chips, they don't taste any better, and they're the wrong size for my taste. I won't throw the cutter away yet, but I don't see myself using it again in the foreseeable future.
In passing, weights again: 206 g of potato gave 117 g of chips.
| Wednesday, 13 May 2026 | Dereel | Images for 13 May 2026 |
| Top of page | ||
| previous day |
|
Decimation
|
Topic: politics, language, opinion | Link here |
Seen in the New York Times app today:
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
That's not decimation? It looks very much like decimation to me. From the Oxford English Dictionary:
The death or destruction of one person or thing in every ten; a reduction by one tenth.
Yes, there are other meanings, but that's closer to the original. OED suggests that one might use the term “literal decimation”, but to claim that a reduction from 33 to 30 is not a decimation requires either a singular lack of understanding or a singular pedanticism (30 > 29.7).
|
Missed the terabyte
|
Topic: technology, opinion | Link here |
Despite Sunday's expectations, I didn't make the 1 TB download limit this month, only 994.93 GB. Yes, with the uploads of 207.11 GB I'm still over the limit, but somehow I feel that I have missed out.
|
Guan Miao noodles
|
Topic: food and drink, opinion | Link here |
Today we had a number of left-over foodstuffs: some breast from an enormous chicken and a jar of mixed “Asian” vegetables that I bought at ALDI for some reason. So this evening I cooked a noodle dish from them.
What's unusual about that? I cook this kind of dish for breakfast all the time. But Yvonne almost never eats anything like that. One obvious difference is the absence of chilis. And Yvonne decided that she wanted the Guan Miao noodles that I haven't eaten for some time. In the end we had:
| quantity | ingredient | step | ||
| 20 g | garlic | 1 | ||
| 10 g | ginger | 1 | ||
| 14 g | spring onions | 1 | ||
| 51 g | celery | 1 | ||
| 137 g | chicken | 2 | ||
| 150 g | ALDI mixed “Asian” vegetables | 3 | ||
| 58 g | small cooked prawns | 4 | ||
| 150 g | Guan Miao noodles, cooked 4 minutes | 5 | ||
| 30 g | light soya sauce | 6 | ||
| 30 g | light soya sauce | 6 | ||
| 20 g | oyster sauce | 6 | ||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
And how was it? As expected, no surprises, beyond the texture of the Guan Miao noodles, which is quite pleasant, and the lack of chili, for which I compensated with chili oil. And as a substitute for chili sauce it's a bit strong. Next time I'll find a different way to incorporate it.
| This page contains (roughly) yesterday's and today's entries. I have a horror of reverse chronological documents, so all my diary entries are chronological. This page normally contains the last two days, but if I fall behind it may contain more. You can find older entries in the archive. Note that I often update a diary entry a day or two after I write it. | Do you have a comment about something I have written? This is a diary, not a “blog”, and there is deliberately no provision for directly adding comments. It's also not a vehicle for third-party content. But I welcome feedback and try to reply to all messages I receive. See the diary overview for more details. If you do send me a message relating to something I have written, please indicate whether you'd prefer me not to mention your name. Otherwise I'll assume that it's OK to do so. |
| Greg's home page | This month | Greg's photos | Greg's links |
| RSS 2.0 |
|