|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Saturday, 20 January 2024 | Dereel | Images for 20 January 2024 |
| Top of page | ||
| next day | ||
| last day |
|
More weeding
|
Topic: gardening | Link here |
Jesse Walsh along today for more garden stuff, mainly weeding. I get the feeling that the weeds are winning.
|
Full spectrum panoramas?
|
Topic: photography, technology, opinion | Link here |
House photo day again today, and as planned I took some photos with my “new” full spectrum Olympus E-PM1. Started off with the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8 mm f/1.8 Fisheye PRO. It proves to be really irritating that I can't use the VF-2 viewfinder; without it I had great difficulty reading the displays. I really need to get these cataracts seen to.
After that, I also took a panorama with only infrared. That required the Zuiko Digital ED 9-18 mm f/4.0-5.6 lens.
The results? We're not there yet. Somehow, despite all claims to the contrary, the first two fisheye sets were out of focus. It seems to have focused on my hand on the panorama bracket:
And everything was so fuzzy that Hugin wasn't able to find control points.
That seemed to be an issue with confirming focus. When I replaced the lens with the 9-18 mm, things seemed sharper, and they also did so when I put the fisheye back on. The camera was set to “middle” focus (the middle 9 of 35 focus points); maybe I should set it to the middle only, like I do on my other camera. But maybe the E-PM1 has difficulties with the fisheye lens, either generally or without the sensor filter. In particular, all the photos with the fisheye showed smudges along the bottom, what here was the left side. And they weren't there in the photos taken with other lenses. Here roughly the same view first with 9 mm rectilinear and then with the fisheye:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
And it seems from the last image above that the lens also has a hot spot, just below the window. I should check my old Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 8 mm f/3.5 fisheye to see if it does better.
|
The annual roast turkey breast
|
Topic: food and drink | Link here |
Once a year or so, round Christmas, I buy a prepared turkey breast from ALDI. Most of it is intended for slicing and eating cold on bread, but the first time round we eat it as a roast.
On a previous occasion I noted that the cooking times were very accurate: 90 minutes at 170° fan-forced to hit a meat temperature of 82°, but that the roast didn't brown. That's at least partially because they want it cooked in foil. Yes, take it out of the foil 30 minutes before completion so it can brown. It's supposed to be turned after 40 of 90 minutes, so I removed the foil at the same time. Still not brown enough. Next time I think I'll turn on the grill at the same time.
| Sunday, 21 January 2024 | Dereel | |
| Top of page | ||
| previous day |
|
US-sanctioned genocide
|
Topic: history, politics, opinion | Link here |
I'm really upset about the situation in what is now the State of Israel. It's horrifying, and I can't see how anybody with any sense of decency can accept it. People who do object talk about the plight of the Palestinians. But it's not because they're Palestinians: they're humans, even if some of the current Israeli government seem to call them the Hebrew version of „Untermenschen“.
Spent much of today watching the video series from Al Jazeera about Al Nakba. Somehow it's not so horrifying any more: after seeing what's going on now, it seems almost “normal”. But it goes to show the power of propaganda. Golda Meir stands up on her hind feet and claims that poor Israel is attacked by seven peoples with armies much larger and better equipped than the Israelis. Who could believe that nonsense?
But people did believe it. I believed it until 1967, and the change in opinion came slowly—not because I was in the area in May 1967, but because I was in Hamburg with my friend Abdul Matin Tatari in October 1967. I didn't believe everything he said, and my doubts grew only very slowly.
But looking back with as neutral a viewpoint as I can muster, it seems that what Israel is doing is completely in accordance with what they had planned even before the Second World War, and which was published after the war: displace all the Arabs from what then was Mandatory Palestine. And that's the gentle part. If they don't want to go, kill them. The current situation in Gaza is just the next step in a long-planned extermination of the Palestinians.
But why, why does the USA support Israel in this genocide? They had the moral high ground in supporting Ukraine against Russia's invasion. With their support of genocide, they have lost that. By comparison, the Russians are gentle. I can only hope that the International Court of Justice comes up with a damning verdict in the South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention). And of course if the USA were to stop supporting these atrocities, a lot could be achieved.
| This page contains (roughly) yesterday's and today's entries. I have a horror of reverse chronological documents, so all my diary entries are chronological. This page normally contains the last two days, but if I fall behind it may contain more. You can find older entries in the archive. Note that I often update a diary entry a day or two after I write it. | Do you have a comment about something I have written? This is a diary, not a “blog”, and there is deliberately no provision for directly adding comments. It's also not a vehicle for third-party content. But I welcome feedback and try to reply to all messages I receive. See the diary overview for more details. If you do send me a message relating to something I have written, please indicate whether you'd prefer me not to mention your name. Otherwise I'll assume that it's OK to do so. |
| Greg's home page | This month | Greg's photos | Greg's links |
| RSS 2.0 |
|